
|
The Rev. Dr.
Michael Kinnamon, a Christian Church (Disciples of
The NCC is the ecumenical voice of America's Orthodox, Protestant, Anglican, historic African American, evangelical and traditional peace churches. These 36 communions have 45 million faithful members in 100,000 congregations in all 50 states.
Kinnamon bio
|
A Prophet for Such a Time as This: March 2011
This following reflection is
adapted from a sermon I preached at
This reflection deals with the
importance of prophetic witness, and the possibility of hope, in
difficult settings – key themes in the writings of Adolfo Ham.
It also points to the prophetic power of scripture and the
necessity of theological conversation in the church – themes that
also figure prominently in his work.
I give thanks for the ministry God has accomplished through
Adolfo over the past eighty years, and pray God’s blessing on him,
and his beloved I can say,
without fear of contradiction, that Habakkuk is not the focus of
many sermons, at least in the English-speaking world!
There are several familiar verses in this short book,
including “The righteous shall live by faith,” which Paul quotes in
Romans 1, and my grandmother’s favorite verse of:
“The Lord is in his holy temple; let all the earth keep
silence before him.”
But Habakkuk hardly appears in the Common Lectionary used throughout
the
Habakkuk
deserves our attention, however, because it raises timeless
questions in a very timely way.
The basic question of the prophet is this:
How can we affirm, how can we give obedience to, a God of
justice and peace in a world that is so apparently unjust and
violent? Of course,
many of us face such a question in personal terms:
Why did my cousin die so young?
She was the most religious person I ever knew.
Why did God give my mother more than she could bear?
Where is the gracious God we talk so much about in all of
this? This is a
familiar biblical theme – for example, in the book of Job. The
prophets, such as Habakkuk, however, are more concerned with the
social than the individual.
Why did those in What makes
this book so unusual even among the prophets is that much of it is a
debate between the prophet and God.
This is certainly not the only time this happens in the Bible
(think of Abraham defending the city of
Some people
may think it is unseemly or inappropriate to argue with God, but I
wish we did more of it in our worship.
The biggest problem, as I see it, is not talking back to God
but regarding God as so distant or unreal that argument isn’t
worthwhile. It is only
when we believe that God is immediate and intensely real that we
will bring our deepest questions before the Lord. In this
case, Habakkuk begins with an argumentative lament.
Most prophetic books start with judgment in the voice of God.
Habakkuk starts with a lament, in his own voice, directed
to God. The oracle
that the prophet Habakkuk saw. O Lord,
how long shall I cry for help,
Destruction and violence are before me; We can tell
from references in the text that Habakkuk lived in Now God
answers. Hold on just a
minute (I’m paraphrasing).
I am about to do something so astonishing that you wouldn’t
believe it if I told you.
But I will tell you. I
am about to get rid of King Jehoiakim by rousing up the Chaldeans
(another name for them is Babylonians) to conquer your country! Look at
the nations, and see! This is
not the response Habakkuk was looking for!
God, he says (again, I’m paraphrasing), this is a very bad
plan! These Babylonians
are worse than our king.
It’s like planting kudzu to prevent soil erosion; it’s like
importing poisonous snakes to get rid of mice.
These people think that justice is simply what they
say it is. There is a
wonderful line in Ezekiel where the prophet declares that the
pharaoh in If you are
having trouble relating to this part of Habakkuk, imagine how
contemporary it all sounds to Christians in, say, the Congo.
Conditions were terrible under former dictator Mobutu –
average income under $100 a year, while the dictator amassed a
personal fortune in excess of $5 billion.
Corruption was routine, violence endemic, the infrastructure
destroyed. And I can
imagine more than one preacher asking, “How long, O Lord, will we
cry and you will not listen?”
But then Mobutu was overthrown in 1997 by armed groups coming
over the eastern border, and the chaos that followed turned out to
be worse. In the five
years of warfare between 1998–2003, an estimated four million
Congolese died (many of disease or malnutrition stemming from the
violence). Let’s be
more controversial. I
know that churches in Iraq (which, ironically, is the site of
ancient Babylon) at times lamented the oppression of Saddam Hussein.
“How long, O Lord?”
Many of them surely welcomed the intervention of the US in
2003, only to watch the country descend into chaos.
The friends I have there among Iraqi Christians could well
cry, “Why, O lord, have you delivered us from one evil only to lead
us into even more violence?” This part of
the book ends with Habakkuk stationing himself on the ramparts “to
see what God will say to me, and what God will answer concerning my
complaint” - which leads to these verses. Then the
Lord answered me and said: The prophet,
as I read it, hears two responses to his challenge.
First, “there is still a vision for the appointed time.”
The present may be a time of violence and economic
injustice, but God has given, through prophets from Isaiah to Martin
Luther King, Jr., a vision (a dream) of a different way of living.
The question is:
Do we trust in this vision?
Or, to say it another way, do the promises of the prophets
speak louder than the newspaper headlines?
We don’t know the appointed time, but we find the
strength to work for a better future not because things look bright,
but because we trust in God. I
like the way the poet, Wendell Barry, puts it:
“Be hopeful, though you’ve considered all the facts.”
We will return to this important insight. The second
response Habakkuk hears from God is summarized in the phrase, “The
arrogant do not endure.”
We have a vision of God’s future in which justice reigns,
and, beyond that, we have the record of history which shows us that
the pretensions of the powerful do not last.
Think of the ancient empires of Babylon, Persia, and Rome.
Think of the colonial empires of Britain, Spain, and Belgium.
Think of Hitler and Stalin and Franco.
The trappings of power, when seen in proper perspective are
illusory, transitory.
Wealth gained at the expense of others ends in ruin, which itself is
a sign of God’s justice being worked out in history.
Now, I don’t
know whether these answers to the problem of unjust suffering are
satisfactory for you; but what I want to suggest, along with Adolfo
Ham, is that the Bible doesn’t so much answer our theological
questions as it calls us into an ongoing theological conversation.
In my experience, Christianity turns narrow and legalistic
whenever we have misunderstood scripture as the last word in
theology rather than as an invitation to do theology.
Habakkuk struggled with the problem of evil in his lifetime;
we struggle with in it ours, informed by his wisdom.
And in this way, our faith is expanded and deepened. The rest of
Chapter 2 is bound to make people in the United States feel
downright uncomfortable.
Starting with verse 6, we have a collection of sayings (five
of them to be exact) that name characteristics of the Babylonian
empire, each of them ridiculing the pretensions of those in power.
As I read it, the prophet is holding a mirror up to any
country or empire that (as my grandmother would have said) gets too
big for its britches – including the United States. Each of the
five sayings begins with the taunting phrase, “Alas for you…”
I don’t have space to look at them all, but take, as an
example, to verses 9-10. Alas for
you who get evil gain for your houses, You hear how
this speaks directly to a dominant issue in American public life:
the search for security.
“Alas for you who… set your nest on high to be safe from the
reach of harm. You have
devised shame for your house but cutting off many peoples.”
We may think that fences and missiles will protect us; but,
in biblical perspective, true security is never won through
unilateral defense but through attentiveness to the injustice that
afflicts other children of God.
Since God is Creator, all life is interrelated (we cannot
“cut off” other people), which means that there is no security apart
from common security.
If American Christians were to take Habakkuk to heart, we would
raise urgent questions about whether spending $750 billion a year on
the military (rather than on houses and health and education in
Louisiana or Liberia or La Habana) is the best way to be secure. Verse 17
also grabs me: “The
violence done to Lebanon will overwhelm you; the destruction of
animals will terrify you.”
Lebanon was known in the ancient world for its wonderful
forests (the “cedars of Lebanon”) which the Babylonians are known to
have cut during their conquests.
This passage speaks of how empires destroy the environment –
and Habakkuk gives us a picture of ruined nature turning on those
who destroy it! You see
why I say this book feels contemporary. And then
there is verse 19. Alas for
you who say to the wood, ‘Wake up!’ This is a
theme that runs throughout the Bible:
Those with power almost always put their trust in idols, as
if the things they have made or bought could save them.
What might Habakkuk say today?
“Alas for you who put your trust in dollar bills or who say
to images on a screen, ‘Give meaning to my life’ ”?
Let me ask
what may seem like a strange question:
Did you ever wonder how the Babylonians saw all this?
They may have seen themselves as a force for good in a world
filled with wickedness.
After all, that King in Judah is an evil doer.
Overthrowing him (they might have said) is an act of
liberation, not conquest.
Without our military presence, the world is an unstable
place, filled with local conflict.
Yes, we carried some people in Judah off to Babylon.
But who wouldn’t rather be in Babylon than in a backwater
like Jerusalem!? We are
the center of the world.
And, besides, these foreigners have a chance to move up in
our society, if only they worship our gods. Maybe that’s
how they thought. But
we don’t know because the Bible, as Adolfo reminds us in his
writings, is always written from the point of view of those
on the margins. That,
of course, is why the Bible seems so alive, so contemporary, in
Africa and Latin America (where the church is growing by leaps and
bounds) and so strangely unfamiliar in North America.
Habakkuk not only holds a mirror up for Americans to see
ourselves, but also forces us to see through the eyes of those who
are not in a rich and powerful country.
And all of the Hebrew prophets refused the
nearly-universal practice of identifying God’s rule with the
purposes of our own group, our own nation, our own church.
God does not bless Judah or Babylon or America more than God
blesses other people. I will end
this brief reflection by noting that Habakkuk ends with a prayer;
all of Chapter 3 is, in effect, a prayer to the One with whom he has
argued. I am
particularly moved by the simple petition in verse 3: “I have heard
of your mercy. Make
that mercy known in our own time.”
I need to
add that the God to whom he prays is not warm and fuzzy!
People who live in empires tend to domesticate God, to turn
God into a super nice guy who upholds the status quo.
The God of the prophets, however, is the Creator of all that
is, before whom even the mountains writhe (verse 10) and the nations
tremble (verse 6). And
the astonishing thing is that this Creator God cares even for us. This
leads us to the closing verses: Habakkuk is
not an optimist; he is a person of hope.
They key word here in this amazing passage is “yet.”
Though the fig tree does not blossom … though the flock is
depleted … yet “I will rejoice in the Lord.” Hope (like
faith) is a gift, but it is also a decision to live a certain way.
The world is filled with wars and rumors of wars; yet
will we hope in God’s shalom - and we will demonstrate the
credibility of our hope by acting to make it so.
The world is filled with those who are desperately poor, life
reduced to a daily struggle for survival; yet will we hope in
the coming of God’s reign of justice – and we will demonstrate the
credibility of our hope by acting to make it so.
The world is filled with examples of the powerful building
walls and effecting blockades that cut people off from one another;
yet will we hope in the day of the Lord when former “enemies”
are reconciled – and we will demonstrate the credibility of our hope
by acting to make it so.
General Secretary National Council of Churches |