NCC Communication Commission Criticizes Reuters
For Refusing to Sell Billboard Space to United MethodistsSee Related Story: Reuters Reverses Its
Policy, Allows United Methodist Ads
October 27, 2003, NEW YORK CITY -- The Communication
Commission of the National Council of Churches, whose members direct the communication
programs of more than 30 national denominations, has issued a statement concerning the
refusal of Reuters Corporation to sell space to the United Methodist Church on Reuters'
electronic billboard in New York's Times
Square.
Reuters canceled its billboard agency's $30,000
Thanksgiving-week contract with United Methodists solely on the basis of its policy not to
accept any religious advertising, regardless of content.
(For full version of the story, from United Methodist Communications: click here;
follow-up story, click
here).
The Commission's statement follows:
Religious
faith is a major force in Americans' lives. More
Americans attend worship each week than attend sports events. Religion has a rightful place in the public square
and an important role in the national discourse. Free expression of ideas, guaranteed under the Bill of
Rights, makes the American democracy work.
But today, the public square is becoming
increasingly like private property, overtaken by larger and larger corporations who
control more and more of our channels of communication, from cable to broadcast networks
to newspapers to billboards. If we get to the
point where a handful of corporations can buy up the walls of the town square and rule
that certain topics, like religious faith, cannot be expressed there -- even when those
who wish to speak are willing to pay for the opportunity -- American democracy will truly
be at risk.
What is it that these corporations -- and by extension, society -- are afraid of? The
voices of faith? Are we afraid that hearing these voices could change the agenda of the
conversation from consumption to conscience? The
public is daily barraged by a torrent of legitimate messages about buying and selling; the
soft-spoken message of faith is about meaning and purpose.
If religious speech is banned from the public marketplace, the remaining dialogue
will revolve solely around getting and spending. But
life is about more than this. The community
of faith should be allowed to say so and let people decide for themselves.
To imply that religious and political
speech might be in the same class with messages that are "pornographic... libelous,
misleading or deceptive in nature," as Reuters did in explaining its refusal to carry
the United Methodist ad, is a frightening use of the power of media ownership. The fact
that 17 broadcast and cable networks and scores of local TV stations have already carried
the United Methodist ad is evidence enough that the problem is not with the ad -- it is
with Reuters' policy.
The free and vigorous expression of ideas
and values, and the positive message of religious faith in particular, is an essential
ingredient in the American way of life, especially in these days of religious pluralism
and the need for mutual understanding. We
call upon Reuters and other corporations who have similar policies to rethink the perilous
path some of them have begun to travel.
Communication Commission of the
National Council of Churches
Eric C. Shafer, chair, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Chicago, IL
Ann Gillies, vice chair, Presbyterian Church (USA), Louisville, KY
Robert Chase, secretary, United Church of Christ, Cleveland, OH
Larry Hollon, treasurer, United Methodist Communications, Nashville, TN
Wesley M. "Pat" Pattillo, NCC Associate General Secretary for Communication, New
York, NY
And
the following faith communication professionals who have added their names to the
statement:
J.
Martin Bailey, Worldwide Faith News, West Orange, NJ
Fr. Bob Bonnot, San Fernando Valley Interfaith Council, Los Angeles CA
David Chandler, American Baptist Churches in the USA, Valley Forge, PA
Edward Cimafonte, The Episcopal Church, New York, NY
Paul Edison-Swift, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Chicago, IL
Dan England, The Episcopal Church, New York, NY
Joan Gaylord, Christian Science Committee on Publication, New York, NY
Deanna Hollenbach, Moravian Church in North America, Bethlehem, PA
Steve Horswill-Johnston, United Methodist Communications, Nashville, TN
Tom Lapacka, Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, St. Louis, MO
Kermit Netteburg, Seventh-Day Adventist Church, Silver Spring, MD, and Simi Valley, CA
Dianna Ott, Presbyterian Church (USA), Louisville, KY
David W. Reid, Vital Theology Journal, Fort Collins, CO
Richard Schramm, American Baptist Churches in the USA, Valley Forge, PA
Jim Solheim, The Episcopal Church, New York, NY
Nikki Stephanopoulos, Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, New York, NY
Philip Tanis, Reformed Church in America, Grand Rapids, MI
-end-
|