NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: 36 communions of faith joining hands and voices to express the love of Christ

Home  About the NCC  |  Education  |  Justice  |  Public Witness  |  Unity  |  NCC News  |  Directory  |  Search  |  Make a Gift


The Experience of One Congregation
in Christian-Muslim Dialogue

The experience of Presbyterians in Sackets Harbor, New York, offers others an opportunity to think about the steps needed in the early stages of Christian-Muslim dialogue. 

Why start? Who decided to act?

Members of the United Presbyterian Church of Sackets Harbor began to ask their pastor, the Rev. Dr. Cynthia Walton, questions about Islam and Muslims after September 11, 2001. 

The pastor gathered the questions, augmenting them with materials from the denominational web site, and presented these to church leaders. These persons decided that, in response to the need, they wanted to talk with Muslims. Who could they contact? An elder had provided business services to the mosque and knew one of its officers. He would provide a link. 

  • The congregation respected the need for Muslims to describe themselves.     


Who did the planning?

Following the initial contact by the elder, the pastor took further initiatives in her role as an educated church professional. “Would the mosque be willing to meet with Christians?” she asked as she invited the mosque to bring a group of its members – men, women, and family members, if they so chose – to the church. She and the mosque leaders talked about a format for a meeting. When the mosque president heard that the Christians normally would close a meeting with prayer, he suggested the evening end with his recitation of a passage from the Qur'an and its translation.

The Christians, as hosts, did their own planning for refreshments. Out of concern for time and dietary laws, they decided that a selection of hot beverages would be acceptable and would provide the ease needed to enable further informal conversation after the formal gathering. 

  • The congregation relied on a person who already had established a relationship with Muslims. 

  • Simple plans were made jointly by the Christians and Muslims. 

  • Christians took responsibility for their hospitality being appropriate to Muslim customs.


How did the Christian congregation prepare itself?

The congregation announced an "Islam 101" session to be held before they would meet for dialogue with the Muslims (most from South Asia). The session was publicized in the media as open to any town residents who would wish to come. Goals of the preparatory session (for and by Christians) included (1) the establishment of vocabulary that would enable conversation with Muslims by those who were unfamiliar with Islam and (2) the development of a sense of common categories of experience and belief between Muslims and Christians. Content included discussion of religious holidays, the concept of community, belief in one God, the main practices of Islam (the five pillars), the life of the founder (Muhammad), the role of women, and early history (including early contacts of Islam with Christians and Jews). 

All those at the preparatory session were asked to write their questions. These were collated and sent to the mosque, to enable the Muslims to prepare themselves. 

  • Christians prepared to be good dialogue partners by learning some basic information. They did not try to answer all their own questions alone. 


What happened at the dialogue event?
How did follow-up emerge?

The meeting occurred in the church sanctuary, a semicircle that allowed a "conversation in the round." Using a roving microphone, the pastor voiced the audience’s questions and facilitated getting follow-up questions. Muslims provided responses. There was a feeling of real interchange because there was opportunity for various participants to speak and to be heard. 

At the end of the allotted time period of one and a half hours, it was clear that Muslim women had given minimal response to questions that had arisen about women. They also seemed overly anxious to say what their husbands would want. The pastor made a decision to close the evening by inviting women to come to a separate session at a later date, when they could talk together. During the refreshments period, she approached both a conservative as well as a more socially liberal woman. Would they be willing to join with Christian women to create a planning team for a women's gathering? They decided there should be a planning group of at least 3-4 from each congregation. 

Muslims also invited Christians to visit their Islamic center/mosque for a tour of the facility. 

  • Although the dialogue was a formal educational event, the room setup and the encouragement of interchange enabled people to relate to one another. The atmosphere did not encourage debate, proselytizing attempts, or one-sided speech-making without opportunity for conversation.  

  • A non-participatory, on-the-spot decision that one segment of the group needed to meet again in separate session was immediately followed by conversation that made the process participatory and mutual.

 
How did planning proceed for the follow-up meeting of women?

The pastor facilitated two planning meetings by offering a detailed agenda of items that would need attention – date and place of meeting, who would invite all women of both congregations and the broader community, who would serve as greeters, how would name tags be prepared, what would be discussed.  

A small difficulty was avoided when it was discovered that the mosque's address list should not have been shared with the Christian members of the planning committee as part of invitation plans. The address sheets were returned. 

It was agreed that the women would eat together at a pot luck lunch. Muslim women wrote an explanation of their dietary regulations to be printed on the back of an invitation. They also agreed to bring hijab (Islamic) garments to the lunch so that Christian women could try them on and experience dressing similarly to their Muslim neighbors. 

The gathering would be at the church. Muslim women would use one of the church education rooms for their noon prayers, after setting up displays and before the lunch and afternoon program.  

Roles were assigned across generations, from young children to older women. The generation of women who had grown up in the U.S., and who were now high school/college students, helped prepare materials and offered help in thinking about what is cultural and what is religious in the experience of the mosque members. They offered comparisons of their lives in the family and the mosque and in the school. 

  • Planners gave opportunity for participants to have a variety of experiences through their senses – seeing, touching, and trying on clothing; smelling and tasting new foods; hearing prayers and songs; talking and listening to one another. 

  • Persons without experience in meeting planning were enabled to participate in mutual planning by having a detailed agenda with well thought-out questions proposed for discussion and decision. 

  • Trust was tested when fear of distributing addresses was expressed by the older immigrant population. Efforts were made immediately to restore trust.  

  • In carrying out plans, women were able to draw in the multiple generations in their families, thus strengthening family values important to the Muslims.

 
How did the Christians and Muslims deal with the question of conversion?

The mosque members included at least one individual who was accustomed to a conversionary stance when he talked with non-Muslims. He was asked to refrain from speaking from this orientation and told that, if participants at the events were interested in pursuing the idea of conversion in either direction, they would be free to come and talk to a leader privately. 

  • Planners recognized that both Christians and Muslims are followers of missionary religions. It was explicitly agreed that  dialogues should follow their stated goals, in this case, education: "We're here to learn from each other."

  • Both sides recognized the openness and risk involved in dialogue – the possibility that someone, hearing the conversation, might choose to explore becoming a member of the other religious community. They accepted this risk, each ready to share the commitments of their tradition openly and respectfully, but avoiding the intention of conversion as being a goal of dialogue.

 



Click on one of the links below to read other sections of this guide to an Open House:

All of this material may be downloaded, copied and used freely, with credit to National Council of Churches, USA. Copies are not to be sold.


NCC Interfaith Relations Home Page

National Council of Churches Home Page