About us

Contact us

This month's prayer

This month's learning moment

ELMC Vision Statement

ELMC 2004-2007 Mission Statement

ELMC Strategic Goals for 2007-2011

Make a Gift

Curriculum and leader formation

Committee on the Uniform Series
Curriculum Conversation Relating Theory and Practice
Education for Mission
Professional Church Leadership

Family and age level ministries

Families and Children
Ecumenical Young Adult Ministries Team
Ecumenical Youth Ministries Staff Team

Racial/ethnic culture and specific ministries

Committee on Deaf Ministries
Pacific/Asian-American Canadian Christian Education
Black Congregational Ministries

Special needs and settings

Disabilities
Outdoor Ministries
Public Education
     and Literacy

Projects and Explorations

ELMC Home

NCC Home Page

ELMC Learning Moment Archives


ELMC Learning Moment November 2011

Honoring the Example of
the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King
  

By Josselyn Bennett

Josselyn Bennett is the Director for Poverty and Justice Ministries of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. Josselyn also serves as Secretary of the ELMC Administrative Board and as a member of the ELMC Committee on Families and Children.  


When I visited the MLK Memorial recently it was a very moving experience. To see the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King’s image captured in stone and the many quotes printed on the surrounding walls. I had just a flourish of memories from growing up in the fifties and sixties. Within several weeks of returning from that visit, I received a commentary from Marian Wright Edelman, President of the Children's Defense Fund that raised for me a call to action… we should not just visit the monument and have a nostalgic moment but that we must be moved to action that will continue to honor Dr. King. She reminded me that Dr. King spoke to the demise of our country if we did not pay attention to materialism, militarism, racism, and poverty. Marian provided some compelling data from the sixties and indicated that today we are faced with even more people living in poverty, almost double the numbers of 1968. Thanks to Marian who offers us a way to recommit to “rescuing Dr. King’s dream – America’s dream”. That is what I want to share with you in her eloquent words: 

Beginning today, let's honor Dr. King by our committed action to

end child poverty and close the morally obscene gulf between rich and

poor in our nation where the 400 highest income earners made as much

as the combined tax revenues of 22 states. They don't need any

more tax breaks and need to give back some of their unfair share of

our nation's tax subsidies and bailouts to feed and house and

educate our children and employ their parents.

 

Let's follow Dr. King by naming and changing the pervasive

racial disparities, undergirded by poverty, that place one in three

Black and one in six Hispanic boys born in 2001 at risk of prison in

their lifetimes. Incarceration is becoming the new American apartheid

and poor children of color are its fodder. Let's reroute our

children into a pipeline to college and productive work to compete

with children from China and India and enable our children to compete

economically in a globalizing economy.

 

Let's honor Dr. King by speaking truth to power and demanding

justice for the poor and vulnerable children with our voices and votes

and powerful persistent nonviolent direct actions. Citizens of every

race and income level must band together to bring our nation back from

the brink of self destruction fueled by unbridled greed of the few and

a military budget that dwarfs our early childhood development budget

where the real security of our nation lies.

 

Let's honor Dr. King by stopping the resurgence of racial

segregation in our schools, unfair treatment of children of color

through zero tolerance school discipline and special education

practices that push them out of school and towards prison. And we must

stand together and resist efforts to undermine the hard earned right

to vote which is the life blood of democracy. Let's not return

to Jim Crow shenanigans that denied the right to vote to Blacks and

other citizens and strangled our democratic processes far too long.

 

Let's honor Dr. King by building a beloved community in America

where all have enough to eat, a place to sleep, and enough work at

decent wages to support a family, buy a home, and raise children in

safe neighborhoods.

 

Let's truly honor Dr. King by transforming our education system that

sentences millions of children to social and economic death by failing

to prepare them and our country for the future. That more than a

majority of children in all income and racial groups and nearly 80

percent of Black and Hispanic children cannot read or compute at grade

level in 4th, 8th, and 12th grades is a national catastrophe which

will bring our nation down.

 

Let's honor Dr. King by ending the violent wars within and without

that destroy lives, families, communities, and drain life giving

resources on weapons of death rather than weapons of life. The guns

that snuffed out Dr. King's life have snuffed out the lives of

over 110,645 children since 1979. Every three hours a child or teen is

killed by a firearm in the United States.

 

Let's honor Dr. King with our unrelenting efforts to ensure that "the

bank of justice" is not bankrupted further and like him refuse

to accept "there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of

opportunity of the nation." Let's send the bounced checks of jobs,

quality education, food and early childhood development back to

Congress and state capitols and tell them to refill our nation's

insufficient bank accounts with transfers from the overflowing coffers

of powerful corporations and individuals from unjust tax breaks and

subsidies and to pay the long overdue promissory notes of justice and

hope millions of children are waiting to receive from the crumbs of

Dives' table.

 

Let us join together as people of faith to honor the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. through our actions today, tomorrow and forever! 

Copyright © 2011, Children's Defense Fund. All Rights Reserved.
25 E Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001 (800) 233-1200

cdinfo@childrensdefense.org

ELMC Learning Moment October 2011 

Comprehensive Children’s Ministry
By Rev. Kay Edwards

Rev. Kay Edwards is the Director of Family and Children’s Ministries, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and serves as chair of the ELMC Committee on Families and Children.


For close to twenty-five years I have been immersed in children’s ministry. Over these years I have grown weary of many well meaning adults who speak of children as “the future of the Church.” They seem to believe that children are empty vessels that need only to be filled with adult notions of faith and prepared to lead in some future time. It is true that adults have much to teach children. But it is also true that children have much to teach adults. They have unique gifts to share, as children. A comprehensive approach to children’s ministry is needed, one that involves ministering to children, finding ways of helping adults open themselves to the ministry gifts of children, and creating opportunities for intergenerational ministry with children.

As a matter of justice, all children need adults to protect them from harm and see that their basic needs for food, shelter, health care, education and love are met. Children’s ministry involves planning for and taking care of the children within the church family and, at the same time, giving of finances resources, time, and effort for the good of children beyond the congregation. Ministry to children also involves offering support to those who daily care for children– parents, grandparents, foster parents, teachers, and childcare providers.

In addition to caring for the physical, mental and social needs of all children, we, as a people of faith, are to be concerned about their relationship to God. Jesus elevated the status of children and recognized children’s gifts for ministry. We read in the Gospel of Mark that Jesus took a child in his arms and said that welcoming children is akin to welcoming God. In Luke 18:15-17, Jesus chastised the disciples when they tried to stop children from “bothering” him. He made sure they knew that children possess a very important key to understanding God’s Kingdom. Children know things that adults need to hear! Yet, in many churches all children are allowed to do is perform. Children’s choirs and children’s sermons are used to entertain adult members. The faith community is cheated and resources are squandered when the gifts and abilities of children are ignored or minimized.

Quite often I hear stories of the spiritual knowledge children possess. It seems they know things about God without being told. Therefore, a good approach to children’s ministry is one based on the belief that children already have a relationship with God. What children really need to deepen their relationship with God are loving guides who teach as well as listen, safe beautiful spaces, and well planned programs. With this approach adults may begin to see children as God created them to be, and become more open to accepting their gifts for ministry and their insights.

In the New Revised Standard Version of Psalm 145:4 we read, “One generation shall laud your works to another, and shall declare your mighty acts.” Every generation has gifts to bring and insights to share for the good of God’s creation. In Jeremiah 31:31 – 34a, we are told that the new covenant God gives us is written upon the hearts of everyone, great and small. Only by spending time with children will adults come to fully understand the realm of God. If older generations are going to impart their wisdom of God and life to children, then time has to be spent with children. In order to approach a full and rich understanding of God’s Realm, adults must seek engagement with all ages.

There is an urgent call for religious people to support, care for and advocate for children. People of faith, who take this call seriously, bring healing into the lives of children and into their own lives. They experience remarkable gifts of renewed life, and energy, personal spiritual growth, and sometimes even numerical growth for their churches. Ministering to children, all children, opening ourselves to the ministry gifts of children and making the effort to enter into ministry with children is not easy but well worth the effort.


The Light a Candle for Children Prayer Vigil is going on right now and calls each of us to pray for and support children. This vigil leads up to the Children’s Defense Fund’s annual observance of Children’s Sabbaths, October 14-16, 2011. Planning an observance of Children’s Sabbath for your congregation or community is a great way to get involved in children’s ministry.


Children’s Sabbath resource materials may be downloaded from www.childrensdefense.org/faith

ELMC Learning Moment August 2011 

Focusing on What Matters Most

 

By Rev. David Burroughs

Rev. Burroughs is the President of Passport, Inc. an ecumenical student ministry that partners with the Ecumenical Youth Staff Ministries Team to produce events for students and those who work with students. Passport is in its 19th year of ministry to and through students, hosting over 6,000 students in this year’s summer programs. David and his wife, Colleen, are active in the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship, and Colleen is the current elected Moderator for the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship.



In my work with students, I am always most interested in what we are teaching them, and what they take from our efforts. For a good number of years I have also been following the Emergent movement in the church, first through Brian McLaren in his books like A New Kind of Christian, and then more recently in Phyllis Tickle’s book, The Great Emergence.

There is little doubt that the mainline church in America is in a time of fairly intense transition. Tickle says that we are fortunate to find ourselves in a “hinge point of history” where the church as we know it will be transformed by the emergent movement.

This is, at first, very unsettling, just as losing valued colleagues to shifting or shrinking denominational dollars. And history shows that institutions are cyclical, and eventually the structure is too heavy to bear and the institution breaks or splits or falls, and then like the Phoenix, out of the ashes new life and structure is born.

I make no claim to be an expert on the Emergent movement, but after some personal reflection and study, a couple of things have begun to crystallize for me. Let me share them for us to consider:

1. Tickle asserts that there has been a pattern of a major upheaval about every 500 years going back to and before the time of Jesus. The last one was the Reformation. The Emergent movement seems to be the beginning of this next upheaval. Of course these times of dramatic change are not just found within the church, but in culture, government, and education. Just as Gutenberg’s printing press helped make the reformation possible, so Zuckerberg’s Facebook and other social media are creating space for the emergence. In this digital age where cell phones are ubiquitous, everyone has a voice and we are seeing a raw democracy that truly empowers the people to have a say in how they are governed, in what they buy, and in how they live. My point? Join in, or be swept aside.

2. At this past December’s Youth Worker Summit, an event sponsored by the NCC through the EYMST, Phyllis Tickle spoke of the need to separate faith from the institution that we have built, to see what parts of the institution will survive this current upheaval, and what will fall away. She concluded her remarks by saying this: “It will be and is your job to train and to form and to spiritually enrich and religiously form and educate the generation and the generation after that who will make those decisions… Emergence Christianity, whatever it’s going to be is in your hands – and may God have mercy on your souls.”

We sat silent as she walked off the stage, overwhelmed with the burden now in our hands and on our shoulders. If we as teachers and writers and ministers with youth and children are indeed setting the stage for what the church will be like in 500 years, then what do we want that church to look like? Sometime today, make a list for yourself of what tenants of the faith and of the church you would want to make sure survive the next 500 years. I think of words like grace, justice, mission to and on behalf of others, God’s concern for the poor and oppressed, real spiritual community, the centrality of Jesus, space for the Spirit.

Next, consider how your daily work supports the words on your list. Does the work we do in ministry to students make a 500-year difference? Games, community building, traditions all have an important place – but we must teach timeless theology. We must focus on what matters – so that students don’t leave our ministry without having heard and internalized the foundations of our faith.

3. Finally, I would speak to what the National Council of Churches is already doing – ecumenical ministry. Those who call themselves Emergents will tell you that they no longer have strong denominational loyalties. Many are leaving the traditional church to find spiritual community in other ways – in house churches, in Celtic rituals, in social media networks.

Instead of closing ranks and entrenching, I hope that we can open our doors and offer untried and maybe even untested ministry and mission. I hope that we can start to work together on projects that reach beyond our tradition and allow us to partner with other denominations to offer ministry in new and creative ways. Perhaps we can no longer be the one stop shop for our churches. Perhaps we can focus on doing a few things well, and partnering with others for the rest. When I was still in High School, the denomination I grew up in had a national office for Experimental Ministry. Of course it is long gone today, but what a title for a young Emergent!

Throughout the Bible when things were about to change, the Angel, or the prophet or the leader would proclaim – “Do not fear!” I would challenge us today that change is upon us, but that we should not be afraid. God is in the change, and all we need to do is follow.


ELMC Learning Moment May 2011 

We are thankful to our colleague, Michael Gibson for this month's learning moment focusing on the use of the spiritual practice of examen in the family context.


 

Examen for Young Children and Their Parents in the Home

        

by Michael Gibson, of Mullica Hill Monthly Meeting (Quakers), Philadelphia Yearly Meeting, Friends General Conference


Children have deep spiritual lives, but may not have adequate vocabulary or tools for expressing them.  There are numerous ways parents can help, including the regular use of examen, a variation of which will be described here.  Examen is an Ignatian (Jesuit) daily examination of conscience and reflection on the movements of the Spirit. Parents can nourish themselves and their families by practicing this discipline with their young children at bedtime, perhaps holding them in bed while doing so. Asking “wonderings” instead of pointed questions can help greatly to build trust (all answers are respected), to provide safety in sharing (there are no “wrong” answers), and to nurture children’s natural capacity for wonder.  I recommend keeping the wonderings open-ended and asking the same wonderings each night.  Children may quickly grow accustomed to, and fond of, this time of intimate sharing with their parents.  Through this practice, children and parents gain skills in reflecting on their own experience and can learn from each other’s spiritual lives in age appropriate ways.  As the children mature, more wonderings can be added as feels appropriate, or each person can enter more deeply into the same wonderings.

 

Below is a suggested format using wonderings inspired by those used in Godly Play® stories.  With very young children you might want to use only two or three of these. Experimentation will let you know whether this model needs any adaptation for your particular family situation. 

 

I wonder what you like best about today.  [Child and parent(s) respond simply.] 

 

I wonder what is most important to you about today.  [Again, after the child responds, the parent responds briefly and simply.] 

 

I wonder if there was any part of the day we could leave out and still have all the day we needed.   [Parent and child might respond back and forth.  It is surprising how many things children sometimes share in response.  Someone was stung by a bee.  The cat got stuck up a tree.  A parent burned the oatmeal.  Someone was very rude.] 

 

Depending on the age of the child and how the wondering is going, the parent(s) might add: I wonder if there was anything about today that you want to keep in your heart and remember.  [The parent also shares in response.] 

 

Wonder one or more of these: I wonder where God was in your day. 

I wonder if (and when) you felt God today. 

I wonder how you listened for God today.

[Naturally, it is extremely helpful for the parent to also respond to the wondering.] 

 

I wonder if there is anything we might say to God about today.  [The prayers that follow might be spoken, unspoken, or both.]

 

Depending on the age of the child, the energy level, and the mood of the moment, the parent(s) might consider adding a period of silent prayer. Don’t be afraid of silence!  Children are often able to be more contemplative than we think.  Initially, it is helpful to give the child something go do in the silence, such as feel and listen to her breath, listen to all the little sounds in the silence that we don’t usually notice, or simply enjoy God.  The child might even suggest something for all to do in the silence.  The parent or the child may decide on the length of the silence.  End with a hug or a good-night kiss. 

_______________________ 

 

Parents can do a variation on this exercise with their children when they come home from school instead of before bed, if this works better.  When a parent asks a child, “what did you do at school today,” the response is likely to be “oh, nothing.”   However, asking more specific, yet open-ended, questions in a spirit of wide-eyed wonder and play often yields expressive results that are rewarding for both parent and child.  Some open-ended wondering questions are offered below.  One is wise not to skip the first one listed, for doing so can very easily make the wondering sound like a test, which is not helpful!  Depending on the age of the child, it may also be wise to limit the sharing session to three or four wondering questions.

 

  I wonder what you liked best about today (or about school today). 

  I wonder what was most important about your day. 

  I wonder if there was any part of the day you could leave out and still have all the day you needed.

  I wonder if there was anything you discovered about yourself today.

  I wonder where God was in your day.

ELMC Learning Moment March 2011

We are appreciative of this month's learning moment which highlights the Lenten resource developed by the NCC Committee on Public Education and Literacy.  Jan Resseger is the Minister for Public Education and Witness for the United Church of Christ and the chair of the NCC Committee on Public Education and Literacy.

 

Journey to Lent, Journey to Learn: 

A Reflection on Public Education in God’s World Today

 By Jan Resseger

Lent is a season for journeying into deeper reflection, and this year the members of the National Council of Churches Committee on Public Education and Literacy created a Lenten study guide, because we have come to believe that the conversation about public school reform in the press and in Congress has gone badly astray.  Our Lenten reflections and calendar of actions invite you to journey with us to think more deeply about these things.

“Compassionate God, cause me to have a mind more like that of Christ.” begins our Ash Wednesday prayer. “Cause my thoughts to dwell in things that edify others and myself and glorify you. The honorable, just, pure, pleasing, commendable and excellent things—make these the subjects of my thoughts, my words, and my actions.”  The Ash Wednesday writer reflects on Philippians 4:8, “Finally, beloved, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is pleasing, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence and if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.”

While in the past it was sufficient for us all to think about public school policies at the state level where control of public education has historically been lodged, today federal policies now affect every public school and classroom in a direct way through the testing policies of the No Child Left Behind Act and the school “turnaround” policies in Secretary of Education Arne Duncan’s Race to the Top program. But while federal policy now directly impacts on public schools with the stated purpose of closing achievement gaps, it has not only failed to address desperate conditions in the schools of our poorest communities, but it has also punished rather than helping children and educators trapped in inadequate schools.

Today’s concerns involve public morality. How is opportunity distributed to children through the vast system we call public education? Can the civil right to public education be redefined as the right to school choice?  Does a federal education policy that emphasizes innovation and “shaking up the status quo” systemically secure the rights and address the needs of all children?  Are the schools that serve 50 million of our children situated in the market or are they the centers of our communities?  Have we begun to worship data and business accountability---measuring and managing---and forgotten that school is a place for helping to form each unique child, created in the image of God?  Have we forgotten to insist on public schools that serve families and children with hospitality and honor teachers with a climate of trust and community? What is the role of public education in our democracy?

In May of 2010, the NCC Committee on Public Education and Literacy drafted a Pastoral Letter, “An Alternative Vision for Public Education,” http://www.ncccusa.org/elmc/pastoralletter.pdf, that addresses these important questions. Sharing the concerns of the Committee, members of the Council’s Governing Board unanimously adopted the Pastoral Letter and sent it to President Obama, U. S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, and members of Congress.

You may not be aware of, nor is it necessary to know, the details of the Race to the Top program or the contentious debate that has now dragged the reauthorization of the federal education law into the fourth year past its scheduled renewal. The reflections and calendar of activities in our Lenten study guide, while not focusing on the specific policy details, will help you familiarize yourself with some of the ethical concerns underneath this debate.

We encourage you to explore our Lenten guide, Journey to Lent, Journey to Learn: A Reflection on Public Education in God’s World Today, http://www.ncccusa.org/2011lentenguidepubed.pdf .  We hope you will consider journeying with us through Lent, following our study guide for personal devotion and/or as the basis for group study, in a Lenten reflection group, an adult education class, a social action committee, a commission on Christian education, or a women’s group. Each week there is a rhythm to the study—reflect, perceive-lament-confess, love, attend, call-share, do, and pray. Our guide suggests some ways that people of faith can respond to the great need and serve as advocates for public education.


ELMC Learning Moment February 2011

In observance of African American History and Heritage Month, our learning moment is offered by The Rev. Dr. Carmichael Crutchfield, an excerpt from a workshop on the Ministry of Music in the Black Church.  Carmichael is the General Secretary, Department of Christian Education, Christian Methodist Episcopal Church and serves on the ELMC Administrative Board, is past chair of the Committee on the Uniform Series, a member of the NCC Governing Board, the ELMC Committee on Black Congregational Ministries and the Committee on Public Education and Literacy.
The Ministry of Music In The Black Church
Based on the Book written by J. Wendell Mapson (1984)

This is a workshop designed to get the local church to think about singing in the local church.  After the session(s) members of the local church are expected to be more in tune with why they sing in the church.

I. Why sing in the church?  

     A. African Tradition
         a. Religion and music is embedded in African life.
         b. Music told the unwritten history of the community.
         c. Alternation of improvised lines and fixed refrains is part of the tradition.
         d. During American enslavement of Africans musical forms of Africa were retained.
         e. A major part of the tradition was the call and response.
         f. Music had an improvisational quality.

 How does the music in your local church embody the African Tradition?  Give examples and discuss in the group.

      B. Black Theology and Black Music
          a. It is how black people see God, the world and themselves
          b. Music gives shape to theology.
          c. Black Church music is the life-blood of the church.  People judge the spiritual tone of the church by its music.  People are drawn into the community of faith by music.
          d. Music is to be a legitimate response to God, telling the story of hardship, disapointment and hope.  It ushers people into the very presence of God and sends people to serve.
          e. Music and Worship in the Black Idiom expresses the communal nature of the black experience, edifying the family of God.  It ministers to the whole person.
          f. It balances the freedom of the Holy Spirit with liturgies.
          g. It is a place of celebration and healing.

You may need the leadership of your pastor to help with discussing the music you currently use in worship.  A good exercise will be to look back over the last month and look at all the music you use.  What does it say about how your church sees God, the world and themselves?

What does your music on Sundays communicate about the spiritual tone of your church?  What is the difference in being “drawn into the community of faith” and “drawn to worship on Sundays?”

Name the kind of music your church uses, e.g. hymns, gospel, rap, etc.  What theology does your church have based on its music?

     C. Biblical Understanding
         a. Worship is a human response to divine initiative.
         b. Music is a way of expressing our faith.
         c. There is spontaneity and freedom.  It was true in the New Testament churches.
         d. Music expresses the present day situation.
         e. Music is guided by the Holy Spirit, but there are restrictions.
         f. Music was an act of celebration in the New Testament churches.

 Because worship is a human response to divine initiative what should our first song(s) express?  (Praise and adoration to God).  What is the first hymn you sing?  What does it express?  If music expresses the present day situation, does that make hymns out of date?  Look at some hymns and answer for yourselves.  Is there room for new hymns to be written?  Why not write some?  Restrictions refer to decency and order (for example you would not break windows and say it was the Spirit)

II.   Why A Choir?

     A. To speak for the congregation because of the possession of certain skills. Rehearses to sharpen and polish the choir’s skills.  The tools of the choir are refined through practice, discipline, commitment and training.  The choir is a collective voice.  A good reason to look the part of unity.  The choir provides the ministry of spiritual growth through singing.

     B. To speak with the congregation as participants in the act of worship. This is done primarily with hymns so everyone in the church can sing.  Of course now that can be done with other genre of music through the use of projecting songs on a screen.

     C. To speak to the congregation with special music, rehearsed and prepared.

During worship all people should be given opportunity to sing.  How does your choir provide spiritual growth to the congregation?

ELMC Learning Moment January 2011  

We are so appreciative of the January 2011 Learning Moment offered by the Rev. Laura Mariko Cheifetz (PCUSA), formerly a member of the ELMC’s Pacific Asian American Canadian Christian Education Committee, serving as the Director of the Leading Generations Initiative at the Fund for Theological Education.

Last March I transitioned into a new role at the Fund for Theological Education to build an alumni network, fundraise, and work with the Transition into Ministry program of the Lilly Endowment.

 

Here at FTE we live and breathe leadership development, from equipping congregations to engage in vocational discernment, to financial and resource support for young scholars and seminarians, to mobilizing alumni to continue to identify promising young people interested in ministry.

 

In this current economy, with few openings at churches and institutions of higher education, some church leaders have questioned the wisdom of encouraging young people to pursue ministry and teaching in theological education. Is it responsible to look to develop leaders for a church whose outlines are rapidly shifting? Should we encourage young people to consider ministry if we are not sure they will find jobs in churches when they graduate? Should we support those who are ineligible for ordination in their traditions due to their gender or sexual orientation?

 

FTE understands that leaders will emerge with or without the intentional efforts of the church. But churches have a unique opportunity to have a hand in supporting leaders otherwise ignored because of age, gender, race or ability.

 

Churches also have the opportunity to play a role in the formation of leaders for the church and the academy, exposed to and invested in diversity, able to navigate the complex worlds of the academy and the ministry, and who have the spiritual and professional resources to flourish.

 

Clergy surpluses and shortages go in waves, but identifying and forming quality pastoral leadership is always necessary for the church. Continuing to cultivate excellent, diverse leadership is not a hopeless endeavor in a tight market, but a hope-filled investment in creating the best, most creative and compassionate leaders for the church.

 

E.B. White once said, “I wake up each morning torn between a desire to save the world and a desire to savor the world. This makes it very hard to plan the day.”

 

The leaders FTE has the privilege to work with and mobilize for the good of the church and the world are gifted with this same struggle. They are bright and savvy. They are engaged and invested in their communities and in developing other leaders. They are, above all, faithful and passionate about that to which they have been called.

 

Churches are in a unique position to nurture questions of vocation in those who are emerging as leaders among us.

 

Dr. Dori Grinenko Baker, FTE’s Scholar in Residence, says of the church she attended in seminary: “they cared for my evolving vocation not because I was special as one called to ministry; it was just part of who they were as a church” (from Greenhouses of Hope). It is in the church’s DNA to engage in this task, because regardless of the swings in the market, we are all in need of capable leaders for the 21st century church.


ELMC Learning Moment December 2010  

This learning moment comes to us from The Rev. Dr. Billye P. Bridges, Director of Christian Education, Disciples Home Missions, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and member of the ELMC Administrative Board, the Committee on Black Congregational Ministries and the Committee on Public Education and Literacy.


"Perspectives on Church Leadership” 

In the twenty-first century, studies have shown that there is a dire need for church leadership development within congregations, both laity as well as clergy. For example, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) in its 2020 Vision of the Christian Church (DOC) called for the formation of 1,000 new congregations, the transformation of 1,000 current congregations, and the calling and forming of new leaders and the continuing re-forming of current leaders. Former General Minister and President of the Christian Church (DOC) Dick Hamm stated, “If congregations are going to be established for European American, African American, and Asian American Disciples, then we are going to have to become committed to serious leadership development.  We need more and better lay leaders; we need more and better licensed ministers; we need more and better ordained ministers.”  In other words, transformed leadership will bring about transformed congregations.   

In Church Leadership: Vision, Team, Culture and Integrity, by Lovett H. Weems, Jr., the author states that “the task of leadership is change.  Leaders must be change masters.  Leadership depends on the responsible use of the gifts and talents God has given to us.  It depends upon the work of the Holy Spirit within our lives, the grace of God. Today’s leaders need a renewal of passion in ministry.”

Robert Greenleaf in his Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness, states “leadership is about caring for people and being useful, about being present for people and building a community at work, about letting go of ego, about bringing your spirit to work, about being concerned with creating a place in which people can do good work, about paying attention, and it requires love. He describes true leaders as ‘those who lead by serving others--empowering them to reach their full potential.’” 

Henri Nouwen in his book, In the Name of Jesus: Reflections on Christian Leadership, describes what leadership is all about.  He reflects “that much Christian leadership is exercised by people who do not know how to develop healthy, intimate relationships and have opted for power and control instead.  The Christian leader of the future is the one who truly knows the heart of God.  The Christian leader of the future needs to be focused on the discipline of dwelling in the presence of the One who keeps asking us: Do you love me?  Servant leadership of which Jesus speaks is when the leader is a vulnerable servant who needs the people as much as the people need him.”

In Reflections on Leadership, edited by Larry C. Spears, his Introduction: Servant-Leadership and the Greenleaf Legacy,” points out that an emerging approach to leadership and service is called servant-leadership.  At its core, servant-leadership is a long-term transformational approach to life and work, a way of being that has the potential to create positive change.  He identifies ten characteristics of the servant-leader, namely: listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to the growth of people, and building community. ”

In The Servant Leader: Transforming Your Heart, Head, Hands and Habits, authors Blanchard and Hodges address questions on leadership.  “What is leadership?  Effective leadership starts on the inside.  Leadership is a matter of the heart.  Servant leadership starts with a vision.  All great leaders have a specific point of view.”

Lyle Schaller’s 21 Bridges to the 21st Century: The Future of Pastoral Ministry deals with change and how church leaders respond.  According to the author, “the numerically growing congregations and denominations of the twenty-first century will not be those that excel in reaching people born before 1940.  It will be those that are organized around excellence, high expectations, facilitating a high level of Christian commitment, and helping congregational leaders develop meaningful responses to the religious needs of new generations of people.”

C. Jeff Woods in Congregational MEGATREND, strongly points out “that the church is changing shape.  The church is transforming. The church is changing the way it worships, grows, ministers and educates.  Megatrends in our congregations are changing the way we do evangelism, discipleship, and ministry; in addition, they are changing the way we view spirituality, leadership, programming and planning.  Today, churches are beginning to use new models of leadership based upon the giftedness of their members.  The laity is no longer just a part of the audience it is becoming increasingly involved in the life of the church. Lay people are attending continuing education events, leading ministries, forming ecumenical partnerships, and preaching sermons.”

Spiritual Leadership in a Secular World: Building Bridges Instead of Barriers by Edward H. Hammett, “notes that today’s church faces a clear and fairly pervasive void of leadership due to many reasons.  For example, the leader’s training is now obsolete for their context.  Leaders have little or no training. The critical challenge of leadership in a changing world is to understand the times…so one knows what to do.  How do we help emerging leaders who want to bring about transforming change to their congregations and their communities?  How do we help congregational leaders in the twenty-first century who want to move beyond maintenance to engage in the mission of God…to build bridges to the community rather than barriers?”

What is leadership?  Who are the leaders of today?  What difference can a leader make?  What support does your congregation provide leaders?  How are leaders developed?  Who are you mentoring for leadership?  What is the role of leaders in the 21st century?

“Whatever leadership may be, for the Christian church it always remains a gift from God.” –L. H. Weems

The gifts Christ gave were that some would be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors and some teachers, to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ.” - -Ephesians 4:11-12

“Jesus’ kind of leadership is the kind of servant leadership needed in our time…Much is at stake.  God is calling you, and God is calling me to something quite beyond what we have ever been or ever done before.”  - N. Gordon Cosby

LMC Learning Moment November 2010  

We are grateful for this month's learning moment which is a synopsis of a forthcoming book which is a memoir that chronicles the lifelong call of Dr. T.M. Thomas to the teaching ministry.  Dr. T. M. Thomas is Professor Emeritus of University of Bridgeport, CT. He is an active member (founding) of the Mar Thoma Church in America holding several responsible positions.  

Plans for a book and free copy: Plans are to publish a book by Summer 2011.  There will be a set number of complimentary copies of this memoir.  If you are interested in receiving one of these complimentary copies, please send your name and mailing address to tmthomas@optonline.net on or before December 25, 2010.  These will be given on a first-come-first-serve basis.


Joyful Vocation of a Teacher:
Autobiographical Reflection on Life and Teaching
 

By Dr. T. M. Thomas  

Each person has a story to share with others. It is unique and conveys the identity of a person. In my case, I wrote the story of my life after much reflection of life achievements and failures, along with priorities placed on choices of life. I see myself as a teacher in schools and colleges, both in India and America. I am committed to the profession of teaching and Christian education conveyed through Sunday schools.   

            Human Identity: It can be explained under three headings: 1. Human Self (It refers to what is common to all human beings as a species. Ex. Men and women are moral and spiritual brings. Another example is the ability to use language). 2. Cultural Self (Humans are influenced or produced by specific cultural institutions. An example is the language we learn, different from many others). 3. Unique Self (There are special characteristics for each person. Ex. Finger-print or DNA structure). After integrating these "selves" I have come up with my own answer and called it "Teaching Self". I was answering the question, "Who are you?", following the dictum of Socrates, "Know Thyself".  

            Early Education: The story of a person begins with his or her early education. The first and best teachers of most of us are parents and other adults in the family. The basic attitudes and values in life are formed in the first three and four years of life. The community itself takes charge of formal and informal education. There is truth in the African proverb, "It takes a village", quoted by Hillary Rodham Clinton. I attended the neighborhood primary and middle schools at Kuriannoor belonging to the Mar Thoma Church. My high school at Kozhencherry was about two miles walking, barefoot, from my house after crossing a wide river (Pampa). In all eleven classes I studied and worked hard, less than half of the students were promoted to the next grade while others repeated the class. The idea of social promotion was not heard of. Though boys and girls attend the same class, there was no interaction between them along gender basis. Such social and educational practices in another country at a different decade, 1940s, are presented in the book.   

            University Education: I studied at two Colleges, one a Catholic College in Changanacherry, half a day distance from home by bus and the other in Trivandrum, a State University called University College (one day travel by bus). Both were prestigious educational institutions. The state university had the highest percentage of professors holding Ph.D. degrees in the state, Kerala. University graduation was a rare achievement in those days. Though not rich, my parents raised enough money to send me to college by staying at hostels in two cities. Without failing in any class either in schools or colleges, I became a graduate of Kerala University at the age of twenty in 1953.   

            High School Teacher:  I started teaching at a famous school in the state, Asram High school, Perumbavoor. This school is known for its high percentage of students passing in state level examination, and co-curricular activities. Most teachers were dedicated and experienced in teaching, showing results in public examination. An immediate vacancy rose soon after the school reopening. I was available to teach biology because the biology teacher was leaving (to America for higher education), the first person among teachers. My first task was to establish myself as a good teacher; and, I believe that I was successful. Then I devoted time or co-curricular activities, needed at this residential school. My contributions for games and sports, drama and school publications were recognized and appreciated. In short, I did my best to be an effective teacher.          

Teacher in Colleges: Though I enjoyed my high school teaching, I had the inner conviction that there was a different or higher calling for my life. Hence I continued my reading habit to become a scholar and to teach at College level. I took leave for one year to receive a Masters degree in Education from University of Madras. After teaching one more year at Asram School, I got a scholarship for higher education in America. I raised money for travel from family sources and reached America. Since my plan was to return after one year, I wanted to travel and see the countries as much as possible. The longest chapter of the book provides the details of travel, called "An All-American Tour, 1963-64". Also, I continued my studies at Boston University as a teaching fellow and took my doctorate in Education, 1968. While studying for my doctorate, I started my full time college teaching at Springfield College, Massachusetts.  

University of Bridgeport Teaching: An Overview: After two years at Springfield College, I continued my teaching as professor at University of Bridgeport for 35 years, 1969-2004. The four areas of responsibilities are

1. teaching courses,

2. research and publication,

3. services to university including committee work,

4. community services.  

All these duties are explained in the chapters of Part V. In the last part (VI), a few central questions are brought together under two spheres of life, one related to my professional life as a teacher in schools and colleges and the second my church life as a Sunday school teacher and leadership positions in the church. 

My commitment to the profession of teaching and to church activities enabled me to formulate my personal values. Among several, I select three and they are:

1. knowledge and wisdom

2. service to others

3. eternal life.


ELMC Learning Moment October 2010 

Youth Ministry in a Changing Context 

By Bronwyn Clark Skov 

I’m trying to help the Spirit birth what may or may not be a new thing in congregations these days. I’m trying to help the church understand that just because there isn’t an appointed or paid Youth Minister doesn’t mean that the congregation is absolved of engaging in ministry with young people. As this economy continues to stress the budgets at all levels of governance in our churches, and many of our denominations are implementing budget and staff cuts, there is a general lament. “But what about our children and youth? Aren’t they the future of the church?” Our culture has become so specialized and compartmentalized that even at church we too often hear the pastor fret over having to let go of Christian Education staff and then confess that he or she doesn’t have a gift for working with young people. But Jesus didn’t call us to build and perpetuate an institution with the help of paid professionals. He called us to make disciples and spread the love of God in relationship with God and our neighbor. 

Several years ago my youngest son was a little perturbed with what he labeled as a “lame” opportunity to take up Confirmation Class at our local church where I had been the youth pastor for almost 14 years. Funding dried up and I had left the employ of the congregation to work at the judicatory level. Predictably, shifting from a paid Youth Minister to a 100% volunteer ministry model was a drastic change at our little church. My own son felt short-changed and was pushing back a bit. He finally took me on in a way that I couldn’t ignore. “Why don’t you home school me for Confirmation discernment, Mom? Please?” 

“Hmmmmm,” I pondered aloud, “Let me think and pray about that, Sweetie. Okay?” 

I talked to my bishop about it. I prayed about it. I laughed about it a little bit. There was no reason for me not to teach my own child. I am a licensed catechist in the Episcopal Church and have planned and coordinated and taught many Confirmation programs with youth over the years. I do struggle with the concept of Confirmation. At its worst it seems to be this required ritual on parental check lists that is expected of the church with no responsibility for the community or the family to actually do anything. And once these young people have jumped through the hoops and made their public affirmation of their Baptism we let them off the hook of continuing the journey in Christ by dismissing and disbanding their class. Their energy and inquisitiveness was neatly contained, their desire to change some things about our music or liturgy was explained away as inconvenient or non-traditional, and since we indulged them in this program that had a clear ending, we can now ignore them again. But that’s my dark side at work and I would rather step into the light. 

Where there is hope and joy in the possibilities of Confirmation discernment, and especially home schooling my boy, is that I was called into examining my own relationship with God through Christ. To be a good teacher I had to open my own heart and mind to see how I was doing in honoring my covenant with God through my own Baptism. It was revealed to me through my heartfelt prayers about this that it was my job as a parent to help nurture my own son in his thirst for conversation and revelation and discernment in his family’s religious tradition. And we both needed to make this journey in community with our clergy and our faithful friends.  

Youth ministry at its simplest is taking the risk and responsibility of teaching and nurturing new and questioning believers. Value them, help them wrestle with their questions, and let them see you wrestle, too.  Invite them into the full communion of the faithful and stand with them when they take the risk of asking a provocative question or suggest change in the local practices. Admit to them that God is still at work in all of us; we simply need to be open to transformation. 

Can I get a witness?


 A member of the Ecumenical Youth Ministries Staff Team,  Bronwyn Clark Skov is the Officer for Youth Ministries in The Episcopal Church. She is also the Team Leader for TEC’s Formation and Vocation Ministries Team in the Department of Mission. Prior to her current call she served on the judicatory staff in the Episcopal Diocese of Minnesota as Canon for Formation and Lay Leadership. She spent 14 years in parish Youth Ministry. She is a lay person who works from her home in rural Minnesota where she lives with her husband and two college age sons.


ELMC Learning Moment September 2010 

Our ELMC Learning Moment this month comes from our former ELMC colleague, Richard Sparrow,  former Minister and Team Leader and Endorser for Professional Ministries for the United Church of Christ and former Vice Chair of Professional Church Leadership.  He speaks briefly about a learning that has grown out of his years of ministry at the denominational and judicatory levels and now again in the local church.  So what do you need to get off your chest?


 

Some learnings are embarrassing in their simplicity, always leaving me grateful for insight while shaking my head saying, “Why does that surprise me?”  Or, “Why didn’t I see that sooner?”  

 

Having quite a bit of life and church experience . . . I’ve long understood the importance of listening . . . listening deeply as someone speaks of illness, loss, joy, conflict, hopes, and fears around living and dying.   Often the response to listening has been, “Thanks for hearing me, it helped just talking about it.” We sometimes refer to this as “getting it off one’s chest”.   As with all of you, I’ve been present with people in hospital, school and board rooms – as well as pastors’ studies, grocery aisles, sidewalks, kitchen tables and coffee shops . . . listening, just listening.

 

After serving in judicatory positions for the past 25 years, I’m now serving a local church in the Heartland – a congregation that has had more than its share of conflict and transition over the past decade.   In this setting, most people have a story to tell about self, family or church - deeply meaningful stories, primarily about loss and conflict.  Here’s the learning – in a new way, I’ve become aware of the distinction between “getting it off one’s chest for good” and “getting it off one’s chest for the moment”.

 

I’ve been a part of and conducted countless listening sessions over the years – having and providing opportunity to speak honestly about struggles within the soul, family, congregation or neighborhood.   But in most of those sessions, I’ve assumed that I – as well as others – “got it off our chest for good.”   Now that I ‘see through a mirror less dimly’, it’s clear that I and those with whom I’ve listened have often been getting it off our chest for the moment and there’s nothing wrong with that.

 

So in many instances, listening isn’t the end . . . but the beginning or continuation of a growing, learning process.   Most of us need the opportunity to talk “get it off our chest” and then to act – to do something – to join with others.  So, I’ve been praying with church leadership around new ways this church can provide more opportunities to gather people who are dealing with similar issues of grief, loss of significant others, employment and health.   The church also needs a bold enough vision, witness or challenging project that many will be drawn together in the investment of mind and soul and strength toward a common goal.  

 

We’re beginning to see the results of this – being clear that we all need to be heard, then many of us need the opportunity to join with others in common sharing and challenge. 

 

 Some learnings are embarrassing in their simplicity.  Once again, I’ve been left grateful for the insight.

 

 

Richard Sparrow

Interim Senior Pastor

St. Paul United Church of Christ

Waterloo, Illinois

ELMC Learning Moment August 2010 

This month's ELMC learning moment tackles a thorny subject in faith formation ministries, Discipline and the Church's Ministry with Children.  We are thankful to The Rev. Kaye S. Edwards, Director of Family and Children's Ministries for the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and Chair of the NCC Committee on Families and Children.

Discipline and the Church’s Ministry with Children 

Disciplining children in church settings is not easy.  Some would say it is impossible.  Children cannot be sent to the principal or stood in the corner when they misbehave at church.  In addition, we are often afraid that correcting the child will offend the parent. What is a church school teacher or youth group leader to do? 

In spite of obstacles, the discipline of children is one of the most important elements of children’s ministry.  The ways in which children are treated at church will stay with them the rest of their lives.  It is an area of ministry that needs the careful consideration and support of the whole congregation.  As is true with other volunteers, when we, who work directly with children, know we are supported and appreciated, we will bring more energy and creativity to our ministry.  Congregational support means having set policies, such as requiring that two adults be present at all children’s gatherings, providing clean and well cared for children’s areas, and making sure needed supplies are available.  If a child with special needs has to have an advocate in order to participate in a program, then one should be provided.  Support means checking-in from time to time to see how things are going.  It means offering opportunities for continuing education. Workshops on child development and conflict resolution can be especially helpful with disciplining issues.  Inspiring and safe programs for children will not happen if we think the congregation’s job is finished once volunteers are recruited.   

Being with children takes a tremendous amount of mental and physical energy.  Therefore, it is doubly important that we who do ministry with children be committed to our own spiritual journeys.  We need the power and direction that only prayer can provide.  Praying for each child, by name, every day and making lesson preparations a part of daily bible study and meditation open the way to God’s help and guidance.  In prayer, we find understanding about individual children.  In prayer, we find strength and patience.   

If we view our ministry with children as an opportunity to help them build their own community, rather than something we provide for them, discipline will be a lot easier.  Even young children can help establish classroom rules, behavior expectations and consequences.  Whenever possible, rules should be stated in the positive. They should be simple, reasonable and concrete.  The fewer rules the better.  Once rules are established, let the children decide how they will share “their” rules with their parents and others in the church.  Also, once rules are established, make sure that they are regularly verbalized, modeled, and practiced.  Children are more likely to behave in positive ways if they feel safe and know what to expect.  Consistency will help the children know what we expect of them.  Follow-through will help the children know what they can expect of us.  

In the church, when problems occur, it is especially important to stay away from punishment models.  Every child has the right to trust that he or she will never be physically hurt, shamed, or made to feel guilty in this place that professes to be about love and acceptance. The best antidote to negative disciplining is thinking ahead.  We must consider how we will handle disruptions and misbehaviors before they occur. The better we know each child the more creative we can be in our disciplining.  Parents are our best source for this knowledge about a child and all parents love to talk about their children.  If we take the time to ask a parent about his or her child’s interests, fears, and special abilities, he or she will know we truly care about his/her child.  Having an already established relationship with parents makes it a whole lot easier to talk with them if a problem does arise.  

There is no magic formula for handling conflict with children, whatever the situation. No matter how much support we receive and how well prepared we are, problems are bound to occur. However, if we do feel surrounded by a loving community which has made children’s ministry a priority, and if we are prayerfully prepared, conflicts can be opportunities of deepening our ministry with children.  It is also helpful if we give adequate attention to community building and establishing relationships with parents.  All of these things can serve us well in our efforts to respond in positive, loving ways to the children in our care.


ELMC Learning Moment July 2010 

We are thankful for this month's learning moment from the Committee on Disabilities, offering excerpts from inspirational words that were created by the World Council of Churches' Ecumenical Disabilities Advocates Network (EDAN) with participation from the Faith and Order Commission. This document, while not meant to be comprehensive, "offers pointers and insights on major theological themes" having to do with the inclusion of persons with disabilities as full participants in the life of the Church.

Rev. Dr. Devorah Greenstein works at the intersections of theology, disability studies, and developmental psychology. She is an ordained Unitarian Universalist minister recently retired from eight years of service as Director of her denomination’s Office of Accessibility Concerns, and she continues her institutional calling as the Chair of the National Council of Churches Committee on Disabilities. She is currently a visiting research fellow at Yale Divinity School, and serves as adjunct faculty at one of the Unitarian Universalist seminaries, Starr King School for the Ministry, a member of the Graduate Theological Union.


Publications:

Helping Children who are Deaf 2003 Berkeley, Calif., Hesperian Foundation Simple Gifts 2000 Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Cooperative
Extension Easy things to make
to make things easy, 1997 Cambridge Mass., Brookline Books
Backyards and Butterflies: Ways to Include Children with Disabilities, 1995 Cambridge Mass., Brookline Books


A Church of All and for All –
Welcoming People with Disabilities

As the author of the letter to the Ephesians stressed: Christ came to tear down the walls (Eph 2:14). Whenever we consider the ways in which to respond to issues of disability, we do well to remember the walls that we have set up. All of these walls are so human, yet they contradict Christ’s ministry of reconciliation; walls that shut people in or shut people out; walls that prevent people from meeting and talking to others... walls of shame; walls of prejudice; walls of hatred; walls of competition; walls of fear; walls of ignorance; walls of theological prejudice and cultural misunderstanding. The Church is called to be an inclusive community, to tear down the walls. (p.1)

All life is a gift from God, and there is an integrity to this creation. We read in Genesis (1:31) that after creating all of heaven and earth and every form of life, God saw that "… indeed, it was very good." God did not say it was "perfect". With the breath of life, God has imbued each person with dignity and worth. We believe that humanity is "created in the image and likeness of God," (Gen 1:26) with each human bearing aspects of that divine nature yet no one of us reflecting God fully or completely. Being in God’s image does not just mean bearing this likeness, but the possibility of becoming as God intends.

This includes all people, whatever their abilities or impairments. It means that every human being is innately gifted and has something to offer that others need. This may be simply one’s presence, one’s capacity to respond to attention, to exhibit some sign of appreciation, and love for other people. Each has something unique to contribute (1 Cor 12:12-27) and should thus be considered as a gift. We cannot speak about this "giftedness" without also speaking about each person's limitations. They are the basis of our need of each other and of God, irrespective of the labeling of our abilities. Living in this interdependence opens us to one another and to a deeper, more honest, self-knowledge, and so makes us each more fully human, more fully people of communion, more fully realizing the Imago Dei we bear... (p.11)

The church is by definition a place and a process of communion, open to and inviting all people without discrimination. It is a place of hospitality and a place of welcome, in the manner that Abraham and Sarah received God’s messengers in the Old Testament (Gen. 18). It is an earthly reflection of a divine unity that is at the same time worshipped as Trinity. It is a community of people with different yet complementary gifts. It is a vision of wholeness as well as of healing, of caring and of sharing at once.

Just as the body is one and has many members so it is with Christ. (1 Cor 12:12)

We all accept and proclaim that this is what the church is and stands for. It is the basis of our unity as Christians. Then why is it that, all too often, certain people among us and around us (usually those whom we consider as being unfamiliar or as strangers, as different or perhaps disabled) are marginalized and even excluded? Wherever this happens, even by passive omission, the church is not being what it is called to become. The church is denying its own reality. In the church, we are called to act differently… Disability does not affect only certain individuals, but involves all of us together as the people of God in a broken world. It is our world that is shattered, and each of us comprise one small, fragile, and precious piece. We all hold the treasure of God’s life in earthen vessels (cf. 2 Cor 4:7). Yet we hold it; and, what is more, we hold it together. In our attitudes and actions toward one another, at all times, the guiding principle must be the conviction that we are incomplete, we are less than whole, without the gifts and talents of all people. We are not a full community without one another. Responding to and fully including people with disabilities is not an option for the churches of Christ. It is the church’s defining characteristic.

Every child and every adult, those with disabilities and those without disabilities alike, will bring specific and special gifts and talents to the church. This is the challenge addressed to us all. Thus we can truly be A Church of All and for All - a church which reflects God's intention for humankind.

May we who are made in your image, O God, mirror your compassion, creativity and imagination as we work to reshape our society, our buildings, our programs, and our worship so that all may participate. In you we are no longer alone, but united in one body. Trusting in your wisdom and grace, we pray gratefully in Jesus' name. AMEN

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This ELMC Learning Moment is excerpted from the World Council of Churches Central Committee’s 2003 statement of inclusion. You may read the statement in its entirety at: http://www2.wcc-coe.org/ccdocuments2003.nsf/index/plen-1.1-en.html


ELMC Learning Moment June 2010 

We are thankful for this instructive piece on using the practice of "wondering" in adult religious education. This month's learning moment comes from our commissioner, Michael Gibson, who serves as the Religious Education Coordinator for Friends General Conference.


On Wondering with Adults
by Michael Gibson 

Most religious educators are familiar with the use of discussion questions in adult religious education settings but might not be accustomed to wondering with adults. 

Both are valuable tools, but sometimes one is more appropriate than the other for a particular topic or setting.  Combining the two can add interest and depth to a session.  Experience will help the facilitator know when to use which tool.  

Below is a set of guidelines to help explain “wonderings” as a facilitation tool.  Some positive examples of wonderings will be offered along with negative ones (which are not really wonderings at all).   

1.  “Wonderings” (statements that begin with “I wonder”) are not as much about questioning of as about mutual wondering with An invitation to wonder must have integrity.  When a facilitator says "I wonder . . .," that person must actually be wondering, not “fishing” for a particular answer, and not using a question to vent, to express an opinion or to veil further instruction.

Negative example: I wonder how you live into the reality that difference can be a blessing and not just a challenge.

Positive example (true wondering): I wonder how genuine differences within our congregation have challenged or enriched you in recent months.  

2. A wondering is open-ended, and relevant to the purpose of the session and the participants’ experience.  It is not a test of knowledge or comprehension but something that moves all in the direction of entering the content and the participants' lived experience more deeply.  The facilitator cannot anticipate the responses to wonderings.  There is room for surprise and reflection.

Negative example: I wonder if you are aware of how many one-time visitors we have had in the past year. 

Positive examples: I wonder what conditions help you to feel safe and welcome when in a new environment. [Pause for responses.]  I wonder what helps, or would help, you to feel integrated and safe within our faith community. 

3.  When using wonderings, each response is welcomed and affirmed as the fruit of reflection, imagination and/or personal experience.  The facilitator assumes goodwill and sincerity unless given obvious indications otherwise.  There are no right or wrong responses, only sincere or insincere ones. Although some responses may seem peculiar or off-task, each response is received with respect.  Facilitators allow themselves the possibility of growing into greater understanding or appreciation of each response.  Contemplative pacing tends to foster deeper wondering; silence need not be feared.     

4.  The facilitator avoids guiding participants to his or her own pre-conceived conclusions through the use of pseudo-wondering because any manipulation can create resistance and destroy the trust needed for open, honest sharing.   

5.  The order of wonderings is important.  When a summarizing or particularly pointed wondering comes first, it can sound like the facilitator is testing to see whether participants got the point of a presentation.  This can stifle wondering and shut down open sharing.  This kind of wondering can, however, work quite well when it comes second or third in order. 

Negative example:  We have heard three people this morning share their stories about journeying towards inclusion.  I wonder what we can conclude from their testimony.

Positive examples: Today we have heard three people share about their journeys toward full inclusion in our congregation. 

[first wondering:] I wonder what you most appreciate about the sharing you have heard. 

[second wondering:]  I wonder what you have heard that feels particularly important to you right now, either in your own journey or in our corporate one.  

[third wondering:]  I wonder what speaks to you with particular power or grace as a member of this community. 

[fourth wondering:]  I wonder what we might do as a faith community to be    more welcoming and inclusive. 

6. Participants often have important questions and wonderings of their own, and it is important to make space for them.  Sometimes what participants raise might threaten to derail even the most careful preparations of the facilitator, but because we want to always be open to how the Spirit is working in the group and because we genuinely care about everyone’s experience, it is important to not be too rigid in one’s group facilitation or time management.  An unexpected wondering arising from the group could well become the most important part of a session.   


Acknowledgement: These guidelines took inspiration from the children’s religious education work of Sonya Stewart and Jerome Berryman.  See Young Children and Worship and The Complete Guide to Godly Play, Volume 1.


ELMC Learning Moment May 2010 

We are thankful to The Rev. David A. Williams for the May ELMC Learning Moment which is a reflection on calling and purpose based on his book.  The Rev. Williams is the senior pastor of the Pleasant Ridge AMEZ Church, Gastonia, N.C. and serves as the National Director of Youth Ministries for the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church.  He is a member of the Ecumenical Youth Ministries Staff Team and a member of the Education and Leadership Ministries Commission.


 

Have you ever pondered what God created you do?  Have you ever asked yourself why was I even created? Why was I given my name, live in my current city, or attend a particular sandwich shop all the time? Could all these things have something in common?  In my book, Birth it for the Kingdom, I write personal experiences, testimonies, and nuggets of God’s word to encourage visionaries to launch their giftedness that the world might be blessed and that our purpose for the kingdom might be fulfilled. There is a purpose which God has selected for you and only you to perform and the kingdom will be enriched when you have accomplished it.

 

I am sure you serve in many capacities in your local community and even within your denomination; but do you really know the one thing God is depending on you to complete for his kingdom? Certainly there are many things that you want to accomplish and, like Jonah, there are assignments you may run from. Although there are assignments you want to ignore, it is incredibly difficult to resist them when you understand why God created you to be on this earth. We are here for a purpose and too often it becomes unrecognizable, distorted, and plainly lost. When this happens, frustration dominates our hearts; and, unfortunately, we become fruitless.

  

There are a few things I want you to consider when you think about why God created you. 


First, your creation was his choice.
We did not choose God; he selected us to birth life-changing ministry for the Kingdom. Kingdom assignments are always fulfilled by ordinary but chosen vessels. When Jesus introduced his earthly ministry, he chose twelve men to follow him. Jesus selected them because they could contribute to the greater cause of the gospel. Whenever God plans to do a major work in the body of Christ, he first chooses a vessel.  The appointed vessel is God’s mouthpiece to complete and maintain his kingdom agenda. God is always looking for willing, able people who are not ashamed to be used for his purpose. Major work requires mature, selfless people who are ready to go forth and complete the task at hand. There is so much work and so many situations that need assistance that God has called you to make them happen. Sure, he can use whomever he wants but for this reason he has called you. The Bible constantly refers to us as “the called of God.” Each believer has been called to some type of work to build up and enlarge the Kingdom. Paul says,” we have been called according to the divine purpose of God.” God has predestined and delegated specific events and activities to be carried out by our hands even before we were in our mother’s womb.

 

Secondly, you were created to be creative. In six days God created the heavens and the earth.  God did this in six days, what can we do in a lifetime? Fourteen years ago, a vision was nestled in my spirit to birth an additional offering unto God called NHP Ministries. NHP stands for No Harm to Praise, and I truly believe there is no harm to praise the Lord. Dr. George McCalep, Ph.D., in his book, Praise the Hell Out of Yourself (Orman, Press 2000), suggests that there is a certain amount of praise which is necessary for every believer to remain stable and productive. I believe people live better lives when true praise is rendered unto God.

 

Praise might get you into trouble with humans; but done right, it will never be an offense to God.  Through NHP, I have released the creativity in me and produced an interdenominational ministry with a strong outreach for youth and young adults. NHP has three major divisions. There is a studio production division that produces radio and TV broadcasts as well as commercial CDs. There is the graphic production division, which produces websites, brochures, etc. and NHP Academy, which was added later. The Academy is a non-profit training and development program serving young ladies and young men between the ages of twelve to nineteen with hands-on professional, technical, and social skills. During this program, teens gain character development and necessary skills to help them transition from high school to higher learning opportunities or work-based training. Currently we have added a book publishing division which has published 10 books of four very gifted authors.

 

Finally, you were created to confirm the next generation. Have you thought about what this world is going to look like in 2020? It will be here sooner than you think and just thinking about it nerves my heart. Who will be our leaders and what will they do to change the world? We were created to be hands-on disciples that are willing to share our resources to make our world better. Every believer is stuffed with possibilities to enlarge the kingdom. Possibilities are created through networking, private devotion, worship, and prayer. As leaders, we will often see the potential in people when they have labeled themselves as underachievers. Several misfortunate experiences can cause a person to think that nothing favorable will happen to or through them. It absolutely blows my mind when I think about the things that can be accomplished in such a short time even for the person who has put their purpose on hold.  I hope your desires are stirred and made fresh in your heart. There is a vision nestled within your spirit that must be released. Your release date is past due, and you cannot wait a day longer to begin. Our task is to exhort the coming trailblazers and confirm their purpose. The more we confirm them the greater blessing they will be for the world.

 

Bruce Wilkinson in his new book, You Were Born for This: 7 Keys to a Life of Predictable Miracles, suggests that there is an urgency to deliver our purpose and to make known why we were created. The appointed time for your vision is passing, and people need what God has deposited in your vessel. The vision that is in you, God has not given to anyone else. This is your vision; you must make it happen at once. When the spies, Joshua and Caleb, returned from the Promised Land, they released the minority report that the city was ready to be invaded and they believed that the most significant time was at once.  I commend you, “Go up at once” and fulfill what you were created to do!


 

ELMC Learning Moment April 2010 

We are thankful to The Rev. Dr. Carmichael Crutchfield, General Secretary of the Department of Christian Education of the Christian Methodist Episcopal Church, and ELMC Administrative Board Member as well as member of the Committee on the Uniform Series and the Committee on Black Congregational Ministries, for the April 2010 Learning Moment entitled:  Christian Education Foundation And Theory:  Social Transformation of Loving Neighbor.  Congratulations to Carmichael on successfully defending his dissertation for his Ph.D. on Monday, March 29th, at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary.

Christian education in the African American church context is often limited in the mindsets of people to teaching, learning, and schooling.  Without a doubt it includes these things, but those three aspects too narrowly define the true essence of Christian education.  The argument is that the definition should include the formation and nurture of people.   Christian education is to be understood as the business of guiding people toward Christian formation in the likeness of the One we follow as disciples. We are helping people find their way to loving God with all their heart, mind, body, and strength and loving their neighbors as they love themselves. 

Eugene C. Roehlkepartain speaking on the subject Christian education says that there must be an emphasis on nurture.[1]  Anne Wimberly says, “We need to do more to make African American Christian education nurturing spaces.”[2]  Actually education is an aspect of nurture, but sometimes what we label as education does not always entail nurture.  For example, when we stand in front a group of people and pour out information for long periods of time without inviting participation we call it education.  However, often the participants are left feeling overwhelmed and overloaded with information and not engaged.  This is often what happens in church settings and it produces very little, if any, growth in individuals.

The problem with education is that it often only entails imparting information and usually in a class room environment. What is attempted through the process of nurturing is to move people toward loving God and loving neighbor.  It is what I believe Daniel Schipani means by “human emergence.”  It is my contention that all we do as Christian educators embodies a ministry of helping people engender the witness of love commanded by Jesus.  The church’s purpose to love God is expressed through nurture.  It is helping people get to know God.  Nurture is a process and not a program of learning.  It is intentional in nature. 

Nurture involves helping people know and love God more.  It is the priority of the church.  Jesus is the model we follow (Matthew 9:35; John 17:6-8, 14, 17, 20).  The Apostles also are models (Acts 2:42; 5:42).  Lastly, it is commanded by Jesus (Matthew 28:19-20).  It seems that God places a high priority on the training ministry of the Church. 

We find in the New Testament a number of distinct Greek words which suggest different strategies, or programs, for the nurture of believers.  A few are mentioned below:

The first is mathetheuo which means discipleship.  This word is referred to in Matthew 28:19-20 when Jesus commissions his followers to go and make disciples.  This is often referred to as the great commission.  This Greek word is defined to mean follower of Jesus, and that is part of the answer.  However, the definition must begin with student or learner. 

A second New Testament Greek word found in Ephesians 4:11-16 is katartismos which refers to equipping.  The author of Ephesians speaks of the gifts of apostles, prophets, evangelists, and pastor and teachers.  According to the New Interpreters Bible commentary, these gifts are not limited to the local church and they are for service.[3] 

The purpose of the service is to equip and build up the body of Christ.  Ephesians assumes all members are part of this building process. 

Everyone in the church is to be equipped for service.  A sign that equipping is complete is when there is unity in faith, knowledge of the Son of God, maturity, measure of the full stature of Christ.  Ephesians closes by emphasizing speaking the truth in love (agape).  We must grow in every way in him who is the head, Christ. 

The essence of the equipping activity is moving the entire body of Christ to love.  This continues to be my argument concerning Christian education.  It is the ministry that helps people to love God and love neighbor.  All members of the church are involved in this ministry; therefore, those who have the gifts outlined in Ephesians are leaders in equipping saints for service or ministry.

The third word is didasko which is referred to in Matthew 28:19-20 as teaching.  Verse 20 in part reads, “and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you…”  Now the disciples are given authority not only to baptize, but also to teach.  Although they have previously shared in Jesus’ authority (cf. 10:1), prior to Easter the disciples had not been authorized to teach.  After baptizing disciples, the continuing Christian community is to instruct them in all that Jesus has taught.  ‘All’ here reflects the ‘all’ of 26:1, and it refers not only to the Sermon on the Mount but to all of Jesus’ teaching contained in the Gospel as well, especially the five discourses.  Nothing is said of Torah, Jesus’ teaching that fulfills the Torah (cf. 5:17-20) is the sole content of the disciples’ teaching, as it will be the sole criterion on the last day (7:24-27).[4]  


[1] Roehlkepartain, Eugene. The Teaching Church. Nashville: Abingdon Press. 1993, 11

[2] Wimberly, Anne E. Streaty.  “Soul Stories.  Abingdon.  Nashville, 1994, 35

[3] The New Interpreters Bible.  Volume IX.  Abingdon. Nashville.  2000, 422

[4] Ibid, 855


ELMC Learning Moment February 2010 


We are so thankful for this month’s learning moment.  It provides opportunities for faith formation in the family context.  Our thanks go to Elise Antreassian, Education and Leadership Ministries Commission Vice Chair and Director of Christian Education for the Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern)


Family Faith: Ten Ideas and a Bible Study for February

“Let love be genuine…hold fast to what is good; love one another with mutual affection; outdo one another in showing honor. Romans 12:9-10 NRSV 

  1. Sit down as a family and read Acts 2:42-47. It describes one of the first Christian communities. Discuss the reading. Then decide one way you might be more a part of your congregation.
  2. Read the story of the prophet Jonah in the Bible. It’s the shortest book of prophecy: 4 short chapters. Discuss: Why do you think Jonah was angry when God didn’t punish the Ninevites? (Hint: We’re not as merciful as God!) Have Swedish fish (a gummy candy) or the cheese snack Goldfish for fun.
  3. Skim the front page of a newspaper together. (Haiti will continue to be heart-wrenching news.) Then make a list of what places and people need your prayers. Pray together. Take your prayers to church and offer them up again next week.
  4. Have each family member use cell phones or a disposable camera to take pictures of their activities during a single day (little children will need their parents’ or siblings’ help). Develop the pictures and mount them on a poster entitled “A Day in the Life of the _____Family.”
  5. On Sunday, February 14, donate heart-shaped cookies for your church fellowship.  Prop up a small announcement (you can make it on your computer): It‘s Valentine’s Day! Enjoy the cookies and remember that God is love. The_____Family.”
  6. As a family, do your spiritual “math” and decide together what you will add and subtract to become closer to God. For example, “add” a prayer and a gift for the homeless, “subtract” an hour of TV viewing.
  7. Family prayer can be powerful. At dinner tonight, make a “prayer jar.” Have everyone write a prayer on a small piece of paper, then fold it and put it in the jar. At family mealtimes, draw one out and pray it together. Add prayers to the jar whenever you wish.
  8. Read Matthew 25:31-40 as a family.  Think of somebody in your own life who is an example of the “least of these” – for example, someone homebound or in the hospital – and one way you can serve that person.  Pray for all people who are sick, hungry, needy, lonely, or in prison.
  9. Take a nature walk with the family. Take turns thanking God for the various parts of creation that impress you.
  10. As a family, make a list of people for whom you will pray during the month.

Devotional: Tabitha sharing her wealth to serve the poor

To Parents: This story is about Tabitha, a woman devoted to serving the Lord by serving those in need.  Tabitha was a disciple, and her faithful example reminds us of the importance of giving to the poor and also of the promise of the resurrection to eternal life for those who faithfully answer Jesus’ call to serve. 

Parents to children: Tabitha was a disciple of Jesus.  We are all called to be Jesus’ disciples.  Jesus taught us that it is when we love one another that we will truly be known as his. (John 13:35) 

Note to Parents: This is the first story in the Bible of one of Jesus’ apostles raising the dead.

Scripture Reading

36Now in Joppa there was a disciple whose name was Tabitha, which in Greek is Dorcas. She was devoted to good works and acts of charity. 37At that time she became ill and died. When they had washed her, they laid her in a room upstairs. 38Since Lydda was near Joppa, the disciples, who heard that Peter was there, sent two men to him with the request, “Please come to us without delay.” 39So Peter got up and went with them; and when he arrived, they took him to the room upstairs. All the widows stood beside him, weeping and showing tunics and other clothing that Dorcas had made while she was with them. 40Peter put all of them outside, and then he knelt down and prayed. He turned to the body and said, “Tabitha, get up.” Then she opened her eyes, and seeing Peter, she sat up. 41He gave her his hand and helped her up. Then calling the saints and widows, he showed her to be alive. 42This became known throughout Joppa, and many believed in the Lord. Acts 9:36-42  NRSV 

 Questions:

(for children)

  1. The Bible calls Tabitha a disciple.  What does it mean to be a disciple? 
  2. Can people of all ages, children included, be good disciples of Jesus? How?
  3. Tabitha did good works.  What are some ‘good works’ you could do in your own home?

(for teens)

  1. What did Tabitha do with her time and money?
  2. What are some things God would want you to do with your time and money?
  3. What are some ways you can serve God today?

(for all)

  1. List some ways you can serve God by giving your time.
  2. List some ways you can serve God by giving to charity.
  3. What are some things your family can do together to serve the poor?
  4. What are some ‘good works’ your family can do together?

Prayer

Lord Jesus, help us to follow Tabitha’s example.  Help us to do good works caring for others so that, as we serve them, your love might fill us. Help us shine your light to the world.  Amen.

 

 

 


ELMC Learning Moment November 2009 

We are thankful for this month's learning moment which serves as a precursor to the ELMC annual meeting theme (January 25-27, 2010, Nashville).  Our gratitude goes to Kirsty DePree, Coordinator of Discipleship, Reformed Church in America and the Rev. Amy Nyland, who is a graduate of Western Theological Seminary and currently serves as Associate Pastor at Alto Reformed Church in Waupun, WI.

Education as Mission

 “Being engaged in mission is absolutely essential to learning the gospel. ”
(Norma Cook Everist)

Norma Cook Everist promotes the idea that without action there is no meaningful learning. In the Bible, James writes extensively about faith and works, emphasizing that faith without works is not really faith. In the same way, learning without mission is not really learning.

Just like we cannot separate faith and works, we cannot separate learning from action. “All that we do witnesses to the beliefs that we hold.” When I show you my works, I show you my faith. Similarly, when I engage in mission, I show you what I understand about the gospel. Jesus did not teach his disciples simply so that they would know, He taught them so that they would go and make more disciples, they were told to find other people to teach the gospel to and then send those people out to do the same thing. That was His purpose and mission for teaching and it must be ours as well.

The problem with many Christian education programs is that they set out to teach specific bits of knowledge with little or no reference to context or mission. What is our purpose as a church? Why are we here? What are we hoping to do? These are the questions that need to drive the education program’s goals and then assess those goals through mission. If our goal as a church is to raise up disciples, then we have to look at our education program and decide how we are going to equip the members of this church to be those disciples. It is not enough to simply know what disciples know, we have to be what disciples are and in so being, do what disciples do. We have to ask ourselves important questions like, “what does a disciple do?” “How do you know someone is a disciple?” “How do disciples behave in the community of our congregation and in the community at large?” “What does the Bible teach us about the reason for discipleship?” We cannot simply claim to be disciples, we have to DO something that looks like disciples should look. When we determine what that is, what a disciple does, then we have a goal and a purpose for our Christian education programming.

Additionally, mission is only mission when there is passion and meaning in the work. How do we bring about that passion and meaning in a program of education? Is the task of education in itself mission? Everist also suggests that the education ministry must involve the whole life of the congregation instead of being taken out of the context of the community. Learning must take place in a context which is relevant to the everyday life of the learner and which is safe for that learner to participate fully. The community must create an environment that is open to exploring the gifts and experiences of the learners and allows everyone to engage the Word and be engaged by the Word.

“The ministry of Christian education uses all the gifts and energy of all the people of God.” Everyone, from preschool to seniors, has a gift to use in ministry. The purpose of education is to discover those gifts and enable their use in the context of a ministering community. Anything else is contrived and potentially damaging to the learner. So then we have to decide not only what a disciple looks like but also what a community of disciples looks like. How does a community of disciples engage the Word of God? How does a community of disciples engage the world?

When we establish a community which embraces the gifts of all the people and allows for the exploration and encouragement of those gifts, provides opportunities for learning through engagement with Christ in a meaningful way and supports the learners in engaging their learning with the larger community through mission we have begun to develop a Christian education program which does indeed promote discipleship.

 Rev. Amy Nyland 

Quotes from: Everist, Norma Cook, The Church As Learning Community: A Comprehensive Guide to Christian Education, Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2002


ELMC Learning Moment October 2009 


National Council of Churches Health Task Force issues H1N1 flu virus check list for congregations

New York, October 15, 2009 -- The National Council of Churches Health Task Force has issued flu prevention guidelines for congregations that includes both standard hygiene activities and unusual worship practices.

Members of congregations are urged to use hand sanitizers, clean door knobs and hand rails, and fill candy dishes with individually wrapped candies. But during the flu season, they are also encouraged to stop shaking hands and hugging one another during the traditional "passing of the peace." Instead, the guidelines suggest substituting "a simple nod of acknowledgement."

Congregations who use disposable plastic cups for communion are well situated for evading the H1N1 and other  influenza viruses. Other congregations are urged to suspend use of the common cup and the practice of "intinction" -- dipping the bread into the wine -- because of their germ-carrying potential.

Of course, pastors and parishioners should wash their hands before anointing persons with oil or before the "laying on of hands ritual."

Churches are also urged to post a church plan for cancelling worship services, nursery schools, daycare centers and senior centers during a flu outbreak.

The NCC's check list, "H1N1 (Swine Flu) and Seasonal Flu Best Practices for Congregations," is posted on the Council's Health Task Force Web page. The list can be downloaded here.

Citing 3 John 1:2a, "Beloved, I wish above all things that you may prosper and be in health," the guidelines note that "pastors and congregational leaders can play an important role as we move more fully into the flu season. Health officials advise extra precautions with the prospect of both seasonal flu and the H1N1 flu virus (swine flu) upon us."


ELMC Learning Moment September 2009

 Advocating for Children 

By The Rev. Kaye S. Edwards, Director of Family and Children's Ministries, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and Chair of the NCC Committee on Families and Children.

“If any of you put a stumbling block before one of these little ones who believe in me, it would be better for you if a great millstone were hung around your neck and you were thrown into the sea.”  Because the gospels of Matthew and Mark place this saying of Jesus shortly after he answers the disciples’ question about who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, I believe he is referring to actual children.  As you will remember, his answer involved taking a child in his arms and talking about adults needing to become like children if they expected to enter God’s realm.  

This seems to me to be a clear mandate to every church about involvement in positive and protective relationships with children. If we are communities striving to follow Jesus, no matter our size, location or resources, we need to be involved in some form of children’s ministry.  Not taking specific actions to protect and care for children is the same as causing them to stumble.  No exceptions.   

Children are among the most vulnerable members of the human race.  They are the ONLY group in our society who cannot advocate for themselves. No child is safe unless all of us are part of the movement to make this world a place of safety for all children.  Therefore, it is vitally important that faithful adults step forward to advocate for children, for their sake as well as our own.   

The Light a Candle for Children 40 Day Prayer Vigil is one opportunity for people of faith to learn about some of the particular problems facing today’s children; pray for children; and take specific actions on behalf of children.  This 40 day prayer vigil leads up to the National Observance of Children’s Sabbaths, sponsored by the Children’s Defense Fund.  The 2009 Light a Candle Vigil began on Sunday, September 6 but you and your community can join at anytime.  A brochure and other information about the vigil can be downloaded here.

“Create Change for Children Today: Bring Hope and a Better Tomorrow,” is the title of the 2009 National Observance of Children’s Sabbaths Weekend.  You will not want to miss this year’s multi-faith Sabbaths planning manual.  It is full of worship ideas, community activities and information about advocating for children that can be used all year long.  Copies can be ordered here.

If your community is not yet involved in children’s advocacy work, the National Council of Churches’ Policy Statement Guide, “Children and the Church: Vision and Goals for the 21st Century" would be a good beginning study.   

In this time of prayer for children may we begin to free our communities of the millstone that is keeping us from being all that God created us to be.  Through educational activities, prayer and specific actions, let us join together to advocate for children.  There can be no doubt that as advocates we will grow in our understanding of what it means to become like children and live fully in God’s presence.


ELMC Learning Moment August 2009

Healthcare

40 minutes for health reform: national faith community call-in with special guest President Barack Obama

Join us Wednesday, August 19th at 5 PM EDT to hear from faith leaders across the country and President Barack Obama! Click here to RSVP and let us know you’ll be on the call, submit a question for the speakers, and learn more about what you can do to help pass health reform.

To listen, dial 347-996-5501 (no passcode, long-distance charges may apply) or log on to faithforhealth.org at the time of the call.

NCC Healthcare Taskforce

Visit NCC’s healthcare website for more information about healthcare and to download bulletin inserts and other resources.

The National Council of Churches, especially through its Committee on Families and Children, and the Health Task Force, senses that our nation’s cry for dependable, affordable health care for all people is growing in volume and strength.  Like the prophet Habakkuk, we believe we hear God’s injunction to “write the vision plain...”  In response, we are committed to work for a straightforward approach that honors all persons and is sustainable by both individuals and society. 

►  A background paper on healthcare reform can be found here.

Pastoral Letter on Healthcare and Call to Action

Read the pastoral letter from H.E. Archbishop Vicken Aykazian, President of the National Council of Churches; the Rev. Dr. Michael Kinnamon, NCC General Secretary; and co-chairs of the NCC's Health Task Force.


Health Care Reform Background 

Nearly 50 million Americans are uninsured, tens of millions more are struggling to maintain coverage, and hundreds of thousands suffer from inadequate care.  Americans have been demanding change, sparking a broad national debate.  Leaders in Washington have been responding by negotiating with health providers and suppliers to gain meaningful concessions and drafting legislation that would lay out a broad new approach to health care.  We are closer than ever before to a system of care that will insure all Americans, and yet meaningful health care reform may still slip through our fingers.  Absent strong public support, health care reform may fail to be enacted. 

Raise Your Voice for Quality Affordable Health Care 

At long last, there is a window of opportunity through which Congress can pass meaningful health care reform legislation.  The Christian community and others have advocated long and hard, and Congress has responded by introducing legislation that reflects some of our top priorities: covering the most impoverished, expanding affordable coverage to the working poor, prohibiting the denial of health care coverage based on pre-existing medical conditions, promoting preventative care, and through the creation of a public insurance option, injecting real competition and choice into the health insurance market.  In the next couple of months, members of Congress will make a historic decision: whether to vote for or against health care reform.  If a sufficient number vote yes, and current proposals becomes law, roughly 95 percent of Americans will eventually have health insurance.  Because of the hard work of the Christian community and others, we are closer than ever to seeing comprehensive, affordable, high-quality health care available to all Americans.  Together, we can celebrate how far we have come. 

Though a new health care reality is close, we are still not out of the darkness.  Congress has not found an answer for how to significantly reduce health care costs – such a change may be beyond the ability of Congress to legislate and may require individuals and doctors to adopt a new approach to health.  Though we and legislators believe that preventative care is both medically and economically sound, congressional budgeters’ models have such care raising costs instead of lowering them.  The reality of the high costs of the current health care systems means that health care reform and expanding coverage is itself expensive – but doing nothing is unsustainable.  Though detractors seek to kill momentum by pointing to the significant costs of reform, as a larger community we need to recognize the difference between waste in the system and meaningful investment in a healthier America. 

Under current proposals, more affluent Americans are being asked to sacrifice financially for the betterment of all.  Legislators are left with a political choice.  On one hand, they can seize this historic opportunity and enact broad reform that protects the broadest number of Americans, but at great economic expense.  Christian teaching of love of neighbor favors this approach, but Congress might well capitulate to a lower price tag and serve only the middle and upper classes.  

Opposition comes from other interests, as well.  These opponents of health care reform – whose profits are threatened by real reform – are spending $1.4 million a day to defeat this critical health care legislation, or remove vital provisions within it.  These voices are telling legislators to do less; to aim for modest reform that would cover fewer people and would, in turn, demand less from businesses, insurers, doctors, pharmaceutical companies, and hospitals. 

Our theology calls us as Christians to enter the public square and speak on behalf of the common good.  Christians believe that all human beings are infinitely valued children of God, created in God’s image.  Adequate health care, therefore, is a matter of preserving what our gracious God has made.  That is why churches and other religious communities have established so many hospitals and other places of healing.  People of faith recognize that health care is not a privilege, reserved for those who can afford it, but a right that should be available all. 

There is another faith principle guiding our advocacy for health care reform – a special concern for society’s most vulnerable members.  Pressure from special interests and the lack of adequate political representation raise the probability that the poor and sick are left out of meaningful social reform.  Political pressure to reduce the costs of health care legislation will be at the expense of those in our society with the least economic and political might.  As faithful Christians, we are called to urge those in leadership in our nation to fulfill their commitment to the vulnerable and sick. Unless the legislation gives adequate attention to the most poor and sick, health care reform legislation will not be worthy of the name.   

Children are also at risk in health care reform.  After 18 months of struggle, in January an expanded Children’s health bill was signed into law.  If some of the current legislative proposals go through without modification, it appears millions of children would fare even worse – not better – as a result of the reform.  Our children’s health needs to be protected under any larger health care reform measure.  Studies have demonstrated that inadequate health care early in life can create significant barriers in education, employment, and can increase likelihood of incarceration.  Health care is so determinative that cutting support for our children’s health would be penny-wise and pound-foolish.  Together, we must stay the course until health care access for children and adults is protected by law. 

Many are urging Congress to work at a slower rate.  As a people, however, we have learned through previous experience that justice delayed is often justice denied.  The same “go slow” tactic that was used to string out segregation is now being applied to health care.  We understand that leaders in Congress need some time to get this bill right and to build support.  Congress needs to hear from us that while there is some time, the sickest and the poorest cannot wait long for health care reform.   

If Congress fails to act within the next few months – and many hurdles remain to be overcome – momentum for large-scale reform is unlikely to return for another decade.  The next few months will be critical as we begin to form consensus on health care reform.  Before reform can become realit, another Senate committee needs to draft a bill expanding and reforming Medicare and Medicaid, and formulating tax changes to pay for such provisions.  Both the full U.S. House and Senate need to pass legislation, then behind closed doors, negotiate the differences between their ideas and finally send identical legislation back to each legislative body for another full vote.  At any point in this process, the dream of whole scale health care reform may yield to the smaller achievement of incremental change.  Members of Congress need to hear from their constituents that health care reform is urgently needed back home and that no one can be left out. 

August is a critical month for emphasizing to representatives and senators that health care reform is a top priority for their constituents.  There is a five-week Congressional recess in Washington, D.C., allowing members of Congress to spend time in their home states assessing what voters want.  Some members of Congress, whose vote is needed to pass health care reform, have indicated that they can only support such a bill after being in dialogue their constituents and being heard themselves in the Capitol.  Now is the time for real discussion.  This is the opportunity for Christians, acting out the sense of love of neighbor, to make their views known.  Faith leaders across America have launched "40 Days for Health Reform" - a massive escalation of the faith community's effort to press Congress to pass health insurance reform that makes quality health care affordable for every American family.  In recognition of this movement, President Barack Obama has accepted an invitation to join us on a conference call on Wednesday, August 19, at 5:00 pm eastern. It will be a wonderful moment to share with thousands of other people of faith who are working towards our health care future.   To RSVP for this call, and to receive the call-in information, visit http://faithforhealth.org/ncc.  

Add your voice by witnessing on behalf of those in need and contact members of Congress saying that:

►    Access to health care is sacrosanct, needs to be protected under law, and should not be a privilege you have to buy, but a right to which you are entitled. 

►    Fulfilling our moral commitment requires special attention to the health care rights of children, the poor, disabled and sick.

►    While we will not tolerate waste in our health care system, we approve spending that invests in the health and coverage of our fellow Americans.

►    People deserve control over their health care, and should have a choice of public and private plans.

►    Congress must vote yes on health care legislation that includes protections for the vulnerable so that all may share in the blessings of liberty. 

There are several paths to being heard by your Congressional representative, but first you need their contact information.  This website, http://www.congress.org/congressorg/officials/congress/, will help identify your members of Congress, and by clicking their names you will be shown the contact information for their offices.  Call both your regional office and the Washington, D.C. office to voice the principles above.  Ask if there is an in-person forum that you can attend.  In addition, a link to weekly list of town hall meetings are posted in the middle “News” box at http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/.  


ELMC Learning Moment - July 2009

By Rosemary Graham, Disabilities Ministries Director for the South Atlantic Conference of the Seventh-Day Adventist Church, and chair of the NCC Committee on Disabilities. 

On July 26th, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) will celebrate its 19 year anniversary.  The ADA (modeled after the Civil Rights Act of 1964) was developed to protect the rights of 54 million men, women and children with disabilities in the U.S. to ensure equal access and opportunities.  There are five categories of the ADA: 

● Title I – Employment

● Title II – Public Services

Title III – Public Accommodations

● Title IV – Communications

Title V – Miscellaneous Provisions  

The ADA helps tear down the myths and stereotypes that society has formed about people with disabilities – negative attitudes of inadequacy, weakness, and uselessness.  The stigmatization towards people with disabilities was so harsh that when Franklin D. Roosevelt (paralyzed from waist down because of polio) became the 32nd president in 1933, he hid his disability from the public (fitting his hips and legs with iron braces, teaching himself to walk short distances using a cane, and leaning on confidant staff workers when speaking to the public). 

During the formation of the ADA, some religious organizations and schools lobbied for exemption from the ADA citing “expenses school would incur and the concern about separation of church and state.”1   Other religious groups, however, supported the ADA passage and complied with some aspects of the law.  The attitude and actions of the religious leaders who rallied against the bill alienated themselves from the disability rights activists and called into question the integrity of their commitment, and their promotion of justice.2 

Attitude is still the biggest barrier people with disabilities face in the religious and community sectors.  Despite the ADA passage in 1990, some lawmakers were able to find loopholes for noncompliancy to the ADA by questioning “proof of disability” and evaluation of use of medical equipment, and the usage of terminology -- ”substantially limited” and “severely restricts”.  Based on two controversial Supreme Court decisions, the ADA Amendments Act3 was introduced on July 31, 2008, and signed by President Bush on September 25, 2008 ensuring: 

● Perception of disability – prohibiting exemption of proof of disability because of use of medication, prosthetic, and assistive technology.

● Actual listing of major life activities and major bodily functions rather than leaving the phrases open to interpretation 

Attitude also remains a challenge for our churches as well.  Even when structural changes are made to church facilities, the perception of “who sinned” remains (John 9:1-3) – from the pulpit to the pew.  Stories still emerge of families of children and young adults with autism (and other intellectual disabilities) being asked to leave the church because of “disturbance” during praise and worship! 

As a church body, we cannot be insensitive and uncaring towards members of our communions and communities who need our consistent love and support.  In Isaiah 56:7 God said…”for my house will be called a house of prayer for all the peoples.” 

We can ensure our churches are welcoming and supportive by: 

● Acknowledging that ministry for, with, and by people with disabilities is needed in our communions for the “whole” family of God. 

● Offering consistent support – being “…eyes to the blind and feet…to the lame.”4

Educating and sensitizing our communion members to the needs of people with disabilities and work together to remove barriers of architecture, communication and attitude so that people with disabilities can serve regardless of their limitations

Affirming the spiritual gifts of people with disabilities 

“Let us join Christ in flinging wide the doors that

 separate us one from another.”5


1Human Disability and the Service of God:  Reassessing Religious Practice, Nancy Eiesland and Don E. Saliers, (page 208)

2Human Disability and the Service of God:  Reassessing Religious Practice Nancy Eiesand and Don E. Saliers, (page 209)

3www.wikipedia.org (Americans with Disabilities Act)

4Job 29:15

5Jubilee Days, Opening Doors to Christ, NCPD


ELMC Learning Moment - June 2009

How Faith Develops

Just as we grow physically, emotionally, and cognitively, so too, do we grow in faith. One of the leading theorists in faith development is John Westerhoff, author of Will Our Children Have Faith? Originally released in 1976, the book was updated and re-released in 2000 and continues to be a valuable resource in the field. 

Westerhoff describes stages or styles of faith as being like the growth rings of a tree in that

 • One style of faith is not better or greater than another. Each style is complete and whole in itself. Therefore, the faith of an adult is not better or greater than that of a child. It’s just different; it’s the right style for that person. But our potential, and God’s will, is that we expand in our faith, just as a tree is destined to add rings in order to grow and mature.

• We expand from one style to the next if the proper environment and experiences are present.

• We move from one style of faith to the next gradually, adding one style at a time in an orderly process over time.

• As we expand in faith, we do not leave one style behind to acquire a new style but add it onto the previous one.

He defines four distinct styles of faith. While he assigns an approximate chronological age to each, many people often remain in the affiliative style. Mature faith is achieved by a minority. It is the faith of the saints. 

1. EXPERIENCED FAITH (early childhood): During the pre-school and early childhood years, children typically act with experienced faith. Their actions are based on what they experience and observe and are influenced by those around them—the significant others in their lives— primarily their parents, but also such people as nursery school teachers and caregivers. The formation of trust is crucial here; it results from a warm, loving, supportive home environment and is the basis of faith. Westerhoff maintains, in fact, that without trust, there can be no faith. 

2. AFFILIATIVE FAITH (childhood): During this period, school-aged children act with others in a community with a clear identity. Just as earlier they learned how to belong to a family, now they learn how to belong to a larger family—the community of faith—their congregation or parish. There are three needs or characteristics of this style of faith.

1. The need to belong. People need to belong to a community and feel that they are contributing something in some way to the life of that community.

2. The need for affections. Before faith becomes anything else, it is first an emotional experience; this is the “religion of the heart.” The community of faith provides emotional satisfaction; it allows the person to experience the awe, wonder, and majesty of God.

3. The need for authority. Children need to learn the community’s story—its traditions, history, beliefs, rules—its way of life. The Church bases its authority on these things; believers need to hear it and make it their own. 

  1. SEARCHING FAITH (adolescence):

Sometime during adolescence or early adulthood, the individual may expand into searching faith, which is also characterized by three needs:

1. The need to doubt. This is sometimes a difficult period for the family or community because those in searching faith need to doubt, criticize, and sometimes even act out against their earlier faith. In order to move from the faith that belongs to the community to an evolved, personal faith, people need to ask questions. At this point “religion of the head” becomes more important than the “religion of the heart.”

2. The need for experimentation. Searching faith moves people to explore alternatives to the ways they know; to test their own traditions by learning about others. Only then, can they reach convictions which are truly and firmly theirs.

3. The need for commitment. Searching faith includes the need to commit to persons and causes. People in searching faith may seem fickle, jumping from one cause to another. But this is how commitment is learned. 

4. OWNED or MATURE FAITH (if achieved, adulthood): If the needs of searching faith have been met, we expand into an owned or mature style of faith. Those who reach this style want to put their faith into personal and social action. They are willing and able to stand up for what they believe, even against the community that nurtured them. Persons who have taken personal “ownership” of their faith witness in both word and deed. This is the “religion of the will.” These people live a life in, but not of the world. Their lives are centered in Christ and they have spiritual health and identity. 

This is our full potential and God’s intention for every person. Religion of the will predominates over religion of the heart and religion of the head but it encompasses both.

How can church and family rediscover their symbiotic relationship? The congregation or parish nurtures the family’s spiritual well-being through its liturgy, sacraments and compassionate authority. Just as importantly, it provides families with the criteria needed to weigh and evaluate the many secular messages that come their way each day. Only so empowered, can families join with God in the sacred task of building a world based on gospel values.


How Faith Develops
Putting Theory into Practice 

1.     Where in Westerhoff’s four styles of faith are you? 

2.     The needs of which styles of faith are met

a.     In Sunday liturgy?

b.     At a church picnic?

c.      At a retreat?

d.     At a church-sponsored “March Against Hunger”

e.      At a church lecture series on “Early Christian Creeds”

f.       At an ecumenical “marriage encounter” weekend

g.     In the Pre-K Sunday School classroom 

3.     List the typical programs and activities of your congregation under the appropriate categories below. Is the picture balanced? 

4.     What can our community do to balance its ministry by nurturing people in all four styles of faith? Add ideas under the list you’ve already made. 

Experienced

Affiliative                

Searching                   

Mature


ELMC Learning Moment - May 2009

Reflections on Tradition and Change

By Michael Kinnamon

The dominant theme throughout last year’s presidential campaign was “change.”  President Obama’s standard campaign speech talked about the need for “fundamental change,” for “choosing the future over the past.” 

None of this, of course, was unique to 2008.  From the early days of our nation, Americans have thought of ourselves as the “new Adam,” as a people who are starting history fresh, unencumbered by the old ways of Europe.  The magazine Democratic Review captured this spirit succinctly in the early 1800s:  “Our national birth was the beginning of a new history … which separates us from the past and connects us with the future only.” 

This idea of change, freed from tradition, has always been seductive – and false.  Surely we are shaped – as individuals, as churches, as a nation – by the persons, ideas, and practices that have gone before.  I affirm that it is possible for the U.S. to repent of and transform a racist past; but it is not wise, or possible, to ignore it.  And, of course, there are many traditional things we want to preserve. 

It is not surprising, therefore, that President Obama sounded a more balanced note in his inaugural address:  “Our challenges,” he said, “may be new.  The instruments by which we meet them may be new.  But those values upon which our success depends – hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism – these things are old … What is demanded is a return to these truths.” 

This tension between past and future, continuity and discontinuity, tradition and change, can be felt in all of our churches, but even more so in a council of churches which, by its very nature, is diverse.  In fact, in my ecumenical experience, “tradition” and “change” often seem to be code words for two distinct paradigms that often have difficulty even talking with one another.   

The most dramatic example of this tension that I have seen in an ecumenical gathering came at the Seventh Assembly of the World Council of Churches, held in Canberra, Australia in 1991.  The theme of the assembly was “Come, Holy Spirit – Renew the Whole Creation,”  and the two major addresses on the theme were from Parthenios, Orthodox Patriarch of Alexandria and All Africa, and Professor Chung Hyun Kyung, a Korean theologian who now teaches in the U.S. 

The Patriarch’s presentation, as you would expect, made constant reference to the doctrine of the Trinity as defined by the early theologians and councils of the church – an indication of the dominance of tradition in his theology.  Professor Chung, by contrast, danced her way to the stage, showing from the beginning her indebtedness to the rituals of Korean Shamanism – a clear departure from the way Christian theology has been done in the past!  The address itself began with an invocation of the spirits of an eclectic collection of martyrs, from Hagar to the students in Tiananmen Square; and her appeal throughout was to experience.  “After many years of …infantile prayers, I know there is no magic solution to human sinfulness and for healing our wounds.  I also know that I no longer believe in an omnipotent, macho, warrior God who rescues all good guys and punishes all bad guys.”1 

Reactions to her address were, to say the least, mixed!  The Orthodox were by no means the only ones who objected to Chung’s approach, but they were the most vocal, issuing a written response that warned against “a tendency to substitute a ‘private’ spirit, the spirit of the world, or other spirits for the Holy Spirit who proceeds from the Father and rests in the Son [the traditional language of the Nicene Creed].  Our tradition,” they continue, “is rich in respect for local and national cultures, but we find it impossible [whatever local cultures teach] to invoke the spirits of ‘earth, air, water and sea creatures.’”2  Such invocation, as they see it, is fundamentally inconsistent with the historic confession of the church. 

Later in the assembly, the staff organized a special plenary for delegates to discuss this controversy, with Professor Chung getting the last word.  What counts as tradition, she said, has been determined for 2000 years by western, male theologians and bishops.  Now it is our turn.  Theologies from the “third world” are the new wine that can’t be put in your old wineskins.  “Yes, we are dangerous, but it is through such danger that the Holy Spirit can renew the Church.”3 

A particularly perceptive commentary on the Canberra Assembly was provided by Konrad Raiser, the WCC’s general secretary for much of the 1990s.  What the assembly revealed, wrote Raiser in the International Review of Mission, is a lack of clarity about the criteria for interpretation (what we call hermeneutics) – to the point that many people are asking if the ecumenical movement has “lost the ability to speak with a common language.”4  Let me quote from Raiser more extensively:  “Professor Chung was guided in her presentation by a contextual hermeneutics, trusting that an interpretation [of the gospel] that arose from the cultural context of Korea would evoke authentic responses from other contexts, even though the language would be radically different.  The Orthodox reflections affirmed a hermeneutics of tradition, accepting the tradition of the apostolic faith as confessed in the early church as the normative criterion for ecumenical communication.”5 

Let me put this in my words.  For the Orthodox and their allies, the visible unity of the church will only be realized if and when we affirm together the faith as expressed in the historic creeds and doctrines and spiritual practices of Christianity.  After all, we don’t invent the gospel, we receive it from our ancestors, all the way back to the apostles.  Without this tradition to rely on, we human beings will usually tailor our claims about what it means to be Christian to fit our culturally-shaped prejudices.  According to this group, when we say the church is “catholic” we are saying that it transcends particular cultures and contexts, calling us to confess a gospel that places all cultures, all experience, under the judgment of God. 

For Chung and her allies, the visible unity of the church is not common confession so much as mutual recognition of those who live in different settings or contexts.  The seed of the gospel may be the same, but the plants that grow from it won’t look the same because they have been nourished by different soil.  This group regards tradition with considerable suspicion, asking whose interests were served, whose power was protected, by historic creeds and doctrines.  For them, the church is catholic not when it transcends cultures but when it adapts itself to, or manifests itself in, diverse local settings. 

The tradition stream emphasizes the unity of Christians across time, and places high value on continuity – “Jesus Christ … the same yesterday and today and forever” (Hebrews 13:8).  The context stream emphasizes the unity and diversity of Christians across space, and places high value on change to meet new challenges and settings.  They are, in effect, speaking different “languages,” which makes dialogue very difficult.   

Another way to say all of this is that our churches, when they try to speak with one another about theological issues (and what isn’t a theological issue?), don’t agree on what counts as evidence for the argument.  It is like lawyers basing their arguments not just on different understandings of the law but on different legal systems.  This is the 800 pound gorilla in the room for the NCC:  One church may say that it is open to the ordination of gay and lesbian persons because it has seen the presence of the Holy Spirit in their lives and because of what we have learned through science and social experience in recent decades about homosexuality.  To which others respond, in effect, “So what?  It isn’t warranted by scripture [at least as they read it] and the traditional teachings of the church.”  They are talking past one another because they are appealing to different sources of authority.* 

*A very clear example of this is provided in the churches’ responses to the famous theological text, Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry, produced by the WCC’s Faith and order Commission. 

How can we deal with this tension between tradition and change within the NCC?  Let me offer three brief suggestions.  First, we can try, quite simply, to raise the issue – and not only in the Faith and Order Commission.  For example, last spring I put on the agenda of our Governing Board a discussion of the churches’ international relationships, in large part so that we could address together the tension within the Anglican Communion over issues of sexuality and authority.  The Episcopal Church, as you know, has been accused by other Anglican provinces of unwarranted change in traditional teachings, especially regarding the sinfulness of homosexual practice. 

I was eager to get such an issue of theological authority on the agenda because, in my judgment, the greatest challenge to ecumenical vitality is the loss of theological depth and conviction that today seems to mark so many of the churches that identify themselves as ecumenical.  In the absence of serious theological engagement, ecumenism will become simply another arena for pursuing political agendas or another set of agencies involved in occasional cooperation – easily demoted on our list of ecclesiastical priorities. 

Second, we can emphasize guidelines for dialogue, ground rules for talking to one another when it is tough to do so, hammered out over the years in the ecumenical movement.  Let me mention two that I think would also be useful for churches struggling with the liberal-conservative divide: 

a)       Allow the other partners in dialogue to define themselves, to describe and witness to the faith in their own terms.  This is the Golden Rule of ecumenism:  Try to understand others even as you would be understood by them.  Do not caricature your neighbor – or, as the Bible puts it, bear false witness.  Avoid generalizations that do not do justice to the diversity inherent in other churches.  And don’t define others by the categories of your own self-definition. 

b)       Interpret the partner and the partner’s faith and intentions in their best (rather than their worst) light.  Robert McAfee Brown makes this point wonderfully with regard to Protestant-Catholic dialogue when he says that, “If Protestants want to be appraised in terms of Reinhold Niebuhr rather than [the fundamentalist] Carl McIntire, they must be willing to evaluate the papacy in terms of John XXIII rather than the Borgias.”6 

Third, we can also try to go beyond such dialogue by stressing the mutual accountability, including theological accountability, that goes with life in a council of churches.  It will not do to remain at a superficial level of theological pluralism, to rest content with having named our differences through dialogue.  It is time, in my judgment, to move from such dialogue to mutual accountability in the following three areas:  a) we are accountable to each other for the way we use and interpret scripture; b) we are accountable to each other for our church’s understanding of (or suspicion about) what is called tradition; and c) we are accountable to each other for the interpretation of reality, explicit or implicit, in our theological teachings.  The idea is to enable conversation among those who have been talking past one another by asking them to explain themselves to one another – or, as 1 Peter puts it, to give an account of their hope (1 Peter 3:15). 

What makes this particularly difficult is that most church leaders still think of the NCC as a cooperative agency, headquartered in New York, that does things on their behalf.  “No!” I tell them.  “You haven’t joined an organization; you have entered into a covenant with one another!”  The essence of any council of churches is the relationship of the churches, including the sort of accountability I have been discussing.  When this is not understood, councils become an ecumenical façade behind which the churches remain as unecumenical as ever.  But that is the subject of another essay! 

Michael Kinnamon
General Secretary
National Council of Churches


1.     Chung Hyun Kyung, “Come, Holy Spirit – Renew the Whole Creation” in Signs of the Spirit, pp. 38-40.

2.     Reflections of Orthodox Participants” in Signs of the Spirit, p. 281. 

3.     Michael Kinnamon, “Canberra 1991: A Personal Overview and Introduction” in Signs of the Spirit, p. 16. 

4.     Konrad Raiser, “Beyond Tradition and Context” in International Review of Mission (July/October, 1991), p. 347. 

5.     Raiser, p. 349. 

6.     For a fuller list of dialogue guidelines, see my book, Truth and Community (Eerdmans/WCC, 1988), pp. 29-32.


ELMC Learning Moment - April 2009

By Cassandra D. Carkuff Williams, Ed.D.

When you hear the phrase, “Christian Education,” what do you think of? When I posed that question to my colleagues, I received the following top 5 responses:

1) Sunday/Church School
2) Bible study
3) Curriculum
4) Youth group
5) Vacation Bible School 

Christian discipleship began around 27 CE in ministry of Jesus as he called people to follow him. The term, “Christian education” is an ancient term, noted as early as 95 C.E. in the 1st Epistle of Clement of Rome to the Corinthians. The concept itself is as old as the faith. Most of my colleagues’ responses refer to recent phenomena, historically speaking, and suggest a narrow arena for Christian Education.

My suspicion is that their thinking is not unlike that of most church folk. In my book, Learning the Way: Reclaiming Wisdom from the Earliest Christian Communities (Alban, 2009), I define Christian education broadly as “the ways in which Christian identity and lifestyle are formed, nurtured, and developed.” My expressed hope is that “whether or not we can reclaim the terminology, we would reclaim the concept in its fullest sense” remembering that: 

. . . before there was a religion called “Christianity,” there were people who staked their very lives on the life, ministry, death, resurrection, and ongoing presence of Jesus. Before sanctuaries and belfries, before organs and offering plates, before pew cushions and stained glass, these followers gathered to celebrate and remember, and to learn more fully what it means to follow Jesus. Before Sunday school and VBS, before memory verses and flannel boards, and even before the existence of a New Testament, there was formation, nurture, and instruction of believers within communities of faith.  

My dream is that we might learn from the first three generations of Jesus-followers ways to nurture authentic faith for a world that is in desperate need of concrete witnesses to the love of Christ. I count it a privilege to be able to share just a little bit of what I learned about nurturing discipleship from my journey to the first century of the Christian faith.

            I can summarize my findings about discipleship in the primitive Christian communities with this sentence: Christian discipleship is a way of being, grounded in vocation, nurtured within community, and guided by tradition. Key discoveries I made on my journey include:

• The work of Jesus was a prophetic ministry in which he proclaimed God’s kingdom through stories, debate with religious leaders, prophetic-symbolic acts, and the life he shared with his followers.

• The call to follow Jesus was a call to leave behind former self-definitions and to accept restored and renewed vocations of being human, of being in relationship with God, of prophetic-symbolic presence, and of dominion.  

• The call presumed community among those who responded, but did not necessarily precede community.

• The primitive communities shared a belief in the ongoing presence of Jesus in their midst; however that presence was actuated in a variety of ways including in the teaching of the Jesus tradition.

• The communities diverged dramatically in how they lived out their beliefs and had profoundly diverse ways of communicating the gospel for new places and times—they used remarkably different language and concepts to tell others about Jesus.

• The communities shared the belief that they were the continuation of Jesus’ ministry and in their communal life became one of his prophetic-symbolic acts as Marianne Sawicki describes it in The Gospel in History:

The cooperative, mutually supportive spirit of the community is presented as one of the signs and wonders which accompany the proclamation of the gospel. The forgiveness of sins seems to be experienced not so much as a future benefit between individuals and God, but as a present condition facilitating brotherly-sisterly care among the members of the community.
  

I’d be hard-pressed to identify the single most important message from the earliest Christians for 21st century Christian education, but if I had to, I’d name the role of the entire life of the Christian community in forming disciples. Without authentic Christian community, we cannot form authentic followers of Jesus, therefore to nurture discipleship, we need to focus all of church life on experiencing the presence of the God who can flood us with unfiltered grace.  

Cassandra Carkuff Williams serves National Ministries, American Baptist Churches, USA as national coordinator, discipleship resource development.


ELMC Learning Moment - March 2009

Standards-Based Public Education Reform: What Does It Mean for People of Faith?

By Jan Resseger

As people of faith we have not traditionally been proponents of standardization in public education. Our creation story in Genesis celebrates each child, created in the image of God, each child a special and sacred person: “God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them…” —Genesis 1: 27 While most of us would agree that there should surely be basic educational standards, we would feel more comfortable with a philosophy of education that rejects standardization and that honors the unique expression of God of each child. 

Prominent educators have also agreed that the goal of education should be to form the whole child. School superintendent, Dr. Rudy Crew writes that public schools should develop four qualities of a mature and conscious contributor to society—personal integrity, workplace literacy, civic awareness, and academic proficiency (Only Connect, p. 33) . Yale University child psychiatrist and school reformer, James Comer, has insisted that schools form children and adolescents along all of the six normal developmental pathways: physical, social-interactive, psychological-emotional, ethical, linguistic, and cognitive-intellectual (Leave No Child Behind, p. 74). Standardized tests measure only a portion of the last two categories—linguistic and cognitive-intellectual.  

In a new introduction for a reprint of her famous book, Other People’s Children, educator and author Lisa Delpit summarizes the clash between “standards-based’ and “whole-child” philosophies of education:

“We in education have allowed politicians to push us to act as if the most important goal of our work is to raise test scores. Never mind the development of the human beings in our charge—the integrity, the artistic expressiveness, the ingenuity, the persistence, or the kindness of those who will inherit the earth—the conversation in education has been reduced to a conversation about one number… Nowhere is the result more glaring than in urban classrooms serving low-income children of color, where low test scores meet programmed, scripted teaching (Other People’s Children, 2005 Edition, pp. 1-3).” 

To help members of our congregations learn about the impact of the standards movement on public education, the NCC’s Committee on Public Education and Literacy has been urging congregational reading groups and social justice committees to read a 2008 book by Linda Perlstein: TESTED.

TESTED recounts the choices that the principal and teachers in one Maryland elementary school believe the standards-based No Child Left Behind forces upon them. Perlstein tells the story of the entire 2005-2006 school year she spent at Tyler Heights Elementary, a school that serves very poor children and teeters on the brink of making or losing the Adequate Yearly Progress rating NCLB awards to a 'successful' school. "Bombard, bombard, bombard those children with the kinds of questions they'll have on the test," the principal rationalizes. "You want the students at a level of automaticity with reading those test-like questions."

The reader spends days stretching into months with the third-grade teaching team. We watch them collaboratively plan each day to the minute, and we listen as the children yearn for more at school—to do some science, read for fun, perform a play. Will the school raise its scores enough? Suspense mounts until the last chapter. Then the reader must then weigh the benefits and costs. 

In an on-line study guide created by the NCC’s Committee on Public Education and Literacy, with help from Cassandra Williams, National Ministries, American Baptist Churches, USA, readers are challenged to contrast the assumptions about learning embedded by No Child Left Behind into public schools like Tyler Heights with a faithful understanding of the role and purpose of learning, even learning in the secular setting of the public school.  Are children mere products to be tested, managed, and made more uniform or is the role of the teacher and the school to nurture, support, encourage and inspire? 

The study guide created by the NCC’s Committee on Public Education and Literacy also seeks to help congregations support the public school teachers in their pews:  “Ask the public school educators to share feelings they experienced while reading this book; compare the responses of professional educators with responses of those who do not work in schools; ask the public school educators if they find strengths in what is happening at Tyler Heights and what they find most troubling; invite teachers in the group who feel comfortable to share how their sense of vocation has been affected by the waves of education reform that have swept across the United States.” 

TESTED is now available in paperback.  The study guide created by the NCC’s Committee on Public Education and Literacy is available on the NCC website.


ELMC Learning Moment - February 2009

Just as the Education and Leadership Ministries Commission has worked to be a community grounded in prayer as exemplified through our monthly ELMC prayer, ELMC also seeks to always be an intentional learning community.  Many of our program ministry committee meetings and commission meeting include shared learning experiences.  In that same vein, we are inaugurating a new practice--the ELMC Learning Moment--which will serve as one more way that we can learn together from our fellow ELMC colleagues and others.  These learning moments may give a glimpse of research or learnings from our colleagues.  They may be a book or film review, an announcement about a new resource that has implications for faith formation, leader development or education and advocacy or musings of other kinds.  We thank The Rev. Mary Jane Pierce Norton, Associate General Secretary, Leadership Ministries, GBOD, The United Methodist Church and ELMC Treasurer, for consenting to model this new online practice for ELMC, sharing a bit from her recent research related to brain development.


One of my areas of interest in Brain Research. I find it exciting because, with new techniques of imaging, we are constantly discovering new things about the human brain. I also find it fascinating as an educator. I recently attended a conference - actually for school teachers and administrators - and learned much more about the executive function of the brain. The executive functions of the brain happen in the frontal lobe. This is the part of the brain that directs and controls perceptions, thoughts, actions, and to some degree emotions. Think of this as a team of conductors or co-conductors of a mental ability orchestra. Through our executive functions we self regulate, we have self awareness and self determination. This gives us our capacity to set goals for today as well as for four years from today. At it's highest function, this is where a deep meditator's brain lights up. In general, the frontal lobe is not fully hooked up until about age 24. There is rapid growth in adolescence so there are huge differences between a 14 year old brain and an 18 year old brain. So, many parents and teachers must do a lot of self-regulating for children and youth until they develop all the abilities needed to self-direct. We develop executive capacity over time but we don't develop everything at the same rate. We have to model, teach, and demonstrate executive function until people get it.

For fun, here is a short quiz. Some questions are just for fun. Others I think lead us to ask what we might be doing with our Sunday schools and our small group ministries.  So - take a moment and see how you do. The answers are at the end of this note.

1.     The brain of a dog weighs about 3 ounces. What is the weight of the human brain?

2.     Which kind of testing is more likely  to create False Memories and thus is more harmful than helpful in learning?

          a.     Short Discussion Answers

          b.     Multiple Choice

          c.     True/False

          d.     Laboratory

3.     True or False:  Humans have 20 types of memory.

4.     The traditional types of "face-reading" tests used to measure ability to read emotions do not work with most adolescents because:

          a.     They don't have an emotional connection with the faces.

          b.     The clothing and hairstyles are dated.

          c.     Their brains can't yet process this type of information.

5.     What kind of thought is used in making moral and ethical decisions - emotional thought or rational thought?  Why?

6.     In pre-frontal lobe thinking we have four areas of executive control. Which of the following is NOT one of those areas?

          a.     Perceptions

          b.     Emotions

          c.     Moods

          d.     Thoughts

          e.     Actions

7.     True or False: The best way to foster executive function is by helping people set goals. Why?

8.     When boys hit puberty they receive about 10 jolts of testosterone a day. Because of this we see an increase in (select the best answer):

          a.     Fear

          b.     Mood Swings

          c.     Aggression

9.     When girls hit puberty they have increased serotonin and estrogen. So that results in (select the best answer):

          a.     Mood Swings

          b.     Fear

          c.     Aggression

10.One of the functions that happens in adolescent frontal lobes is pseudostupidity. Define please:


 


Here are the answers:

1. 3 lbs.

2 b. (We lay down neural paths that are hard to shift because we have sifted and rejected other answers)

3. F (We actually have 40 types of memory! With learning, we are processing to memory. No wonder it gets harder to remember as we get older.)

4. a (Teens success in reading emotions shot up when it was people they cared about.)

5. Emotional Thought. For me, this is particularly important for us in the field of religious education and faith formation. One of the findings is, 'the less emotional our learning, the less likely it is to steer behavior later in life. So, as we work with people of all ages regarding moral and ethnical decisions, it is important to include activities that shift individuals from simply a rational consideration of, say, a teaching of Jesus, to an emotive experience.)

6. c.

7. T. (I think this is very helpful to know. If we want people to be able to grow as disciples, we know that includes setting goals for practices and actions. So, it might be interesting to look at our curriculum to see when and where we are asking learners to set goals, then report back on those goals.)

8.c.(Surely we know this.)

9. a (And this one as well.)

10. Pseudostupidity is the act of applying complex strategies to a simple task. Here's an example around making friends. An adolescent may decide in order to make friends he or she must show up at a particular place and at particular time dressed only in one brand of clothing. The simple solutions (speaking to someone; joining the choir, etc.) seem to escape them because their decision-making paths are still being formed.


Hope you enjoyed this short little brain break!  Mary Jane

Rev. MaryJane Pierce Norton, Associate General Secretary
Leadership Ministries
GBOD The United Methodist Church
1908 Grand Ave.
PO Box 340003
Nashville, TN 37203-0003
mnorton@gbod.org
www.gbod.org <http://www.gbod.org/>
"Equipping World-Changing Disciples"

Current Learning Moment

Return to NCC Home Page